Print This Page
Customers most agreed on the following attributes:
from Santa Cruz, CA on 9/4/2009
Comments about Fujifilm Fujifilm Fujichrome Sensia RH 400 Color Slide Film ISO 400, 35mm Size, 36 Exposure, RH-36, Transparency:
good for cross processing in lower light situations
Tags: Made with Product, Using Product
[1 of 1 customers found this review helpful]
from Houston, TX on 1/23/2008
Comments about Fujifilm Fujifilm Fujichrome Sensia RH 400 Color Slide Film ISO 400, 35mm Size, 36 Exposure, RH-36, Transparency:
Works fine on semi cloudy and cloudy days. The tonal range is not the best
on bright sunny days. Grain is sharp, but beyond 8" x 10" it starts to become too noticeable. No worry on very warm days about keeping it cool, which is reguired by the "professional" slide films
[0 of 1 customers found this review helpful]
from Greenville, NC on 3/27/2007
Comments about Fujifilm Fujifilm Fujichrome Sensia RH 400 Color Slide Film ISO 400, 35mm Size, 36 Exposure, RH-36, Transparency:
I have been using this film for a long time because its versatility more than meets my needs.
from California on 2/18/2007
Comments about Fujifilm Fujifilm Fujichrome Sensia RH 400 Color Slide Film ISO 400, 35mm Size, 36 Exposure, RH-36, Transparency:
Sensia 400 ISO slide film is a fine example of how much better film is vs older examples. Color balance and accuracy are very good and there is little grain. With a fast lens hand-held shots in very low light are done with ease.
[2 of 3 customers found this review helpful]
from northwest Indiana on 2/12/2007
Comments about Fujifilm Fujifilm Fujichrome Sensia RH 400 Color Slide Film ISO 400, 35mm Size, 36 Exposure, RH-36, Transparency:
Back in my younger days I used to buy E-6 kits and do my own processing. Ektachrome always looked green in the shadows; Fujichrome fared much better.
While Ektachrome looks excellent when processed by Kodak, I never was able to get the hang of E-6 processing. I tried tap water, distilled water, and distilled deionized water. Nothing helped.
I switched to Fujichrome (mostly Sensia 400) for about the last 15 years and have been generally pleased with the results.
The characteristics of Sensia 400 become apparent when compared to Velvia 100. The latter is much more saturated and has much higher contrast. While Velvia 100 slides look fantastic when projected, I suspect that they would be more difficult to scan with an inexpensive scanner like a Prime Film.
Velvia 100 also appears much sharper than Sensia 400, but the sharpness will probably be lost once the image is scanned and loaded onto a DVD for home viewing on a regular (non-hd) tv.