PhotoZAP 36: Peek-a-boo

Back to PhotoZAP page
Average of 5 ratings: 5.0 stars
 

5 comments Read comments Rate this article

Our critics praise and pan your pictures

By Adorama Learning Center Editors

February 11, 2010

“A few adjustments beforehand could have avoided this joyous shot’s glaring technical defects”—Mason Resnick


 

Bookmark and Share

© Ron McClarey, San Luis Obispo, CA. Gear: Nikon D90, Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D lens. Exposure: 1/4000 sec. at f/2.8, ISO 2800, Aperture mode, handheld.

Photographer’s Statement: The reason I was taking this photo is that I had a session planned where I was going to take pictures of all the Mom's and their kids that were in my wife's MOPS group (it's a Mom's group).  So I took my wife to the same location at the same time of day to figure out the lighting, get used to this lens and get some ideas for what I would do with the other Mom's.



Our critics say…   


Monica Cipnic: This photograph wonderfully captures the energy and spontaneity of the moment. When photographing children, those happy 'spur-of-the-moment' expressions don't necessarily wait for us to re-compose an image. This is a great photo of the mom and her child on the left side—they are both sharp and leaning out of the frame. Then we have the second part of this picture, the animated boy in the back, with his slightly overexposed face and shirt, and his head tilted off to the right side of the frame towards the dappled brightness in the background—all of which the viewer's eye naturally goes to first, and that wouldn't be such a problem, except that he's obviously not in focus. Without the benefit of re-shooting with a better composition, and working with what we have, the photographer needs to take down the highlights, and crop the right side.


Jack Howard: The only things I'd do is tighten up the cropping a tiny bit, slap a warming filter at it and stick this in a frame and stick it up somewhere in the house. There's such joy and personality in this candid portrait. Sure, a slightly lower angle would remove the grass and brown edge and give cleaner b/g separation, but for a fun family moment, this can't be beat!


Mason Resnick: I’m frustrated with this shot. As Monica and Jack point out, the moment captured is wonderful, and this shot deserves to be proudly displayed with minor tweaks. However, a few adjustments beforehand could have avoided its most glaring technical defects. 1. Choose a smaller aperture. At f/5.6, you could have gotten everyone in focus if you focused on Mom. 2. Dial down the ISO. ISO 800 would have minimized noise. 3. Choose a slower shutter speed. 1/500 sec would have frozen the action just fine. f/5.6 at 1/500 sec at ISO 800 would have given you an identical exposure, but better image quality.

 

What do you think? Leave a comment!

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

5 readers rated this article. Average rating: 5.0 stars
 
  • View
  • 5 comments
0 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
Some people don't read

It says ISO 2800 at the bottom of the image caption for those few who seem only able to read-into, instead of just read. As for the image, candids are the hardest images for me to make. People don't sit still, someones always out of focus, or jumping out or into frame, and the entire affair seems pointless to attempt with anything longer than a 50mm lens. Thank you for reviewing this image, I learned a lot.

by Rick Hicks in Tampa Bay, Fl on March 2, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Out of Frame Edit

I agree with all comments to date! There is a wonderful opportunity to make this into a 'killer' shot. (Guess what editor I've been reading of late!) Crop the mother and younger child in a close white portrait frame. Then have the older child popping out-of-frame. Out-of-focus would then be entirely in context. Great mischief! . . . . Adrian Warnshuis,

by patrick in Port Jervis, NY on February 25, 2010

1 of 2 people found this comment helpful
 
Great photo, great advice

Love this photo. I feel the energy and the joy...and I appreciated hearing the technical tweaks. I'm wondering if the boy who is out of focus was meant to be in the shot originally, or if he popped up on his own. The Warming of skin tones and background flaws can be Photoshopped. The family moment is priceless! Thanks to the photographer for sharing this.

by Carol in Raleigh, NC on February 13, 2010

1 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
nice

like Mason's technical explanation using apertures.

by W.H. Handyman in CA on February 12, 2010

3 of 4 people found this comment helpful
 
Interesting as family photo.

I don’t know how you came up with ISO 2800, but that’s just a big exaggeration. No more said. It is not easy to analyze picture like this, because, it was so spontaneous and not planned. On one hand, it is a nice family photo. I think the blurred boy is rather a positive aspect of this composition. If he was not blurred, he would appear as growing of the women’s body, which I think would not be a pleasant effect. The blur gives a sense of distance. The biggest attribute of this picture, in my opinion, is its unexpected outcome – great family value. On another hand, when I first looked at the picture it seemed to me a little to heavy on the left side – I mean the main focus of the picture is too far to the left thus positioning the blurred boy to be almost the main interest point.

by Zereeo in Tampa on February 12, 2010

Items per page
Showing 5 of 5 results

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
Bookmark this page