Adorama Camera
Adorama Learning Center
Gear Guides & Reviews
Lenses and Filters
Product Review: Sigma 50-500mm f/4.5-6.3 lens

Product Review: Sigma 50-500mm f/4.5-6.3 lens

Back to Lenses and Filters page
Average: 4.0 stars
 

For this long zoom lens, the Optical Image Stabilization is the star

In 2005, Sigma introduced a monster 10x zoom lens, the 50-500mm f/4-6.3 EX DG/HSM, which offered flare-reducing lens coating, a HyperSonic motor and SLD glass.


Five years later, they’ve come up with the replacement, reducing the maximum aperture slightly but adding optical image stabilization. And the stabilization, as it turns out, makes this a very nifty and practical superzoom lens.

 

The Sigma 50-500mm is a big, heavy lens, and requires its own tripod mount ring.

Look and feel

The lens has been redesigned from the bottom up, with 22 elements in 16 groups (which would account for the lens’s substantial 69.5-oz weight), four SLD elements, and a big 95mm filter thread. (If you’re using a DSLR with an APS-C sensor, you can attach a step-down ring that will allow you to use 86mm filters.) There’s an updated super-silent HSM motor.

The 50-500 f/4.5-6.3 is  a BIG lens, measuring 4.1x8.6 inches—nearly twice that long when zoomed all the way. As befitting such a behemoth, it comes with its own tripod mount ring and carry case. Available accessories include a 1.4x and 2x teleconverter, and the lens is available in Sigma, Sony, Nikon, Pentax and Canon mounts.

 

I had to stay on the path and off the flower bed, which means at 50mm (right), I couldn’t get terribly close to the flowers framed by this tree. But at 300mm and 1:3.2 magnification and with Optical Stabilization turned on, I was able to get a nice, sharp, hand-held close-up (below).




The lens is hefty and well-built, with the flecked matte black barrel that is typical of high-end Sigma lenses. The ribbed focus ring offers moderate resistance, while the ribbed zoom ring offers more significant resistance, perhaps a tad too much. Sigma seems to have tightened its zoom rings in general lately, perhaps as an effort to avoid zoom creep. In fact, there was no zoom creep here: when I held the lens face-down while set at 50mm, the zoom mechanism didn’t budge.

The lens also allows for fairly close focusing, given its focal range, and intermediate focal lengths and magnification ratios are clearly indicated on the lens barrel as you zoom out. Minimum focus distance increases with focal length. Interestingly, its highest magnification ratio, 1:3.1, comes at 200mm. At 500mm, magnification is 1:4.5.

As with the variable focus, both the maximum and minimum apertures change with zoom. The smallest aperture registers as f/22 at 50mm, and f/32 at 500mm and f/29 at the middle focal lengths.

 

I have to be honest: bees scare me. I respect my phobias, and keep my distance. At 500mm, I was able to fill the frame with this little guy from a safe 8 feet away.

Stabilization and Image Quality

But really, the star of this show is the optical stabilization. Sigma claims it will give you four stops worth of steadiness, so theoretically, you could hand-hold this lens at shutter speeds as low as 1/60 sec at 500mm. I took the lens on a field trip to find out if these claims hold up in the light of day.

There are three optical stabilization modes: Off, OS1, and OS2. I found OS1 to be better are steadying the shot at the moment before exposure, and felt that one had the edge. Even when zoomed all the way out, images felt surprisingly stable…until the weight of the lens itself started to become too much.

 

Optimal conditions: In bright sunlight, with stabilization turned on, I was easily able to get a sharp close-up at 500mm at 1/500 sec. The test shots I made in lower light showed that I was able to get sharp handheld images at 500mm at 1/125 sec, and only minimal shake at 1/60th sec—very impressive!

I was easily able to get good hand-held exposures at 1/125 sec at 500mm, and barely-noticeable shake at 1/60 sec (the shakiness becomes apparent at full 100% enlargement).

Focus speed was fairly fast, although it did slow down at the longer focal lengths. But at around 300mm, it was quick enough.

 

Can the 50-500mm capture action? Sure! I caught this jogger handheld at 1/1250 sec at f/6.3 and 400mm.


Overall, image quality was excellent. There was slight pillow distortion at 50mm that was gone by 100mm. Flare, as one might expect for a long zoom lens, was prominent at 200-500mm, and moderate below that. I highly recommend using the lens hood to reduce the likelihood of flare. There is slight red fringing at 50mm in the corners. Interestingly, the fringing improves in the middle zoom range, especially at 100-200mm, but returns somewhat by 400mm.

At 50 through 300mm, images were tack-sharp in the center, with very slight fall-off around the edges at the widest aperture. By middle aperture (f/8-11) the focus is fairly consistent throughout the focal plane. The center remains sharp through 500mm, however even at the smaller apertures there is slight fall-off, which is slightly more pronounced with the aperture opened all the way. While it won’t compete with primes, it comes close in the middle apertures. Considering this lens’s long reach, this is a very good performance.

 

Did you know turtles can move awfully fast when they feel threatened? Moments after I took this picture from about 25 feet away at 500mm, I moved a step closer and these sunbathing guys suddenly jumped into the water.

Conclusion

The Sigma 50-500mm lens is not a starter lens: its bulk and weight are significant, and if you’re looking for a tele zoom to supplement your kit lens, this would be overkill. It’s much better suited for serious hobbyists and some professional users. It’s an excellent lens for wildlife photographers; its focal range, which translates to 75-750mm, is plenty for capturing shy wildlife, and can even come in handy for many sports shooters. The slower maximum aperture at longer settings (6.3 at 500mm, 5.6 at around 300mm) might cause sports shooters to balk, but if you have a DSLR that delivers high quality at high ISOs in low light, such as the Nikon D300s, for example, this lens could be more than enough.

About The Author

Mason Resnick is the editor of the Adorama Learning Center and a lifetime photography enthusiast.

moreRelated Workshops

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

13 readers rated this article. Average rating: 4.0 stars
 
  • View
  • 13 comments
0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Good for 1pm Sat. Football Games?

I am using a D300 and I have the 70-200mm f2.8 lens which I bought for Friday Night football games. I LOVE the lens-I still use it constantly! I am now taking Saturday games with decent lighting. The 200mm is much too short and I wonder if the 50-500mm f/4.3-6/3 is the solution or will it be too slow to get decent football (sports) pictures ? I dont want a blurry mess. Anyone have any experience with this subject? The D300 was my first DLSR camera. I have figured out many of the challenging aspects but I am not an expert. iamwilson at aol dot com if you want to email me directly.

by in New Hampshire on

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Nice review, great lens.

I have the older model without OS, when I recieved it new the focus motor didn't work. No proble, shipped it off to Sigma and had it back PDQ. Works wonderfully, but I wish it had the OS in it for handheld shots as I travel light and usually don't lug around my tripod. Now if Sigma would offer a buy back or upgrade program for those of us who want the next generation lens without breaking the bank.

by in Southern, Illinois on

1 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
It helped me buy this lens with absoluteness!!

Whether I can afford the name brands or not, for a serious amateur like me, this is the best bang for my money! Until I start making money for this expensive hobby, to pay for equipments and then some, this BIGMAMA is the best value hands down!! Thanks a million!!:):)

by in Edmonton, Canada on

5 of 5 people found this comment helpful
 
The more I use it, the more I like it

Thanks for the review. I have been pleased with the results from this lens on my Nikon D90 for wildlife photography. True, it's heavy. But I have carried mine on a tripod, across my shoulder, on forest trails for several hours and felt very little fatigue. Handheld, the lens can be hard to hold steady when zoomed to 500mm, but that's to be expected and it is my reason for keeping it on a tripod much of the time. But, on a tripod, the images are hard to beat. Colors can lack some contrast in certain settings but I've been amazed how accurate they have been in others. In any case, I always shoot in RAW, so deficiencies are fairly easily addressed with my photo editing software. At times I think a lighter, somewhat shorter reach lens would have been a better use of my money, but then I look at the zoomed shots I have caught with this lens and realize, for the money, there's no better solution for my needs.

by in Mechanicsburg, PA on

0 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
why didnt they do this to begin with?

If Sigma would just settle down and improve what they have instead of adding multiples for people to waste their money on, they'd be selling alot more lenses. I had the problem of weight, with a bad neck, and bought the 150-500 sigma instead of the canon 500mmf4. Great colors, but disappointed in quality, and finally I slipped back to my canon 300f4+1.4x tele for more clarity. So there was $900 wasted. Often thinking why didn't they just add OS to their present 50-500? Well now they have. But too late for me. I finally broke down and bought the canon 500f4IS which is expensive, heavy, but the quality is yards above the sigmas. It is too heavy for me, but I can hand hold, and live with excellent bird in flight and wildlife photos. I love sigma colors, and their light weight lenses serve the general public, but I know alot of people who would pay more for them if they were better quality. Don't know if I could trust that now.

by in irvine, ca on

2 of 2 people found this comment helpful
 
Why two lenses?

We have a 150-500 OS and a 50-500 OS for the same reason we had the 170-500 and the 50-500. The 170-500 was a consumer grade zoom and the 50-500 was an EX lens. There is a good reason for the almost $1000 difference in price between the two new lenses: image quality

by in SA on

6 of 9 people found this comment helpful
 
Compared to Sigma 150-500?

I'm not sure I understand the reason for this lens. Sigma has a 150-500mm OS lens (which I have). Most people who buy these lenses use them at the maximum focal length. The price of this lens is about 30% higher than the 150-500mm. So why should someone pay the extra 30%? Does this lens perform better than the 150-500? Is it worth the extra money?

by in USA on

0 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
Response to Phi

Good point--lifting and holding the lens was a substantial work-out and did cause some arm strain after a few minutes of holding. Most of the time, it will likely live on a tripod or monopod, but the shake reduction does give you a real option for hand-holding.

by in New York, NY on

4 of 6 people found this comment helpful
 
BigMaMa

The 2nd edition of the BigMa looks huge. How long can you hand hold this monster? I have a BigMa and it stays on my tripod a lot, not because it doesn't have OS, but because it's just too heavy to lug around handheld. I only use it for nature and wildlife shots though, so speed and stabilisation aren't big issues for me, unless something startles my target and they bolt. But then, OS wouldn't help me in that situation either. I think this lens would be well suited for parents of baseball players. Lots of standing around under the sun should yield more than a few good shots.

by in Baguio on

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Thanks!

Thank you! Very helpful.

by in CO on

Items per page
Showing 10 of 13 results
Page:

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
Bookmark this page