Get the best value shopping our selection of used gear.
We Pay top dollar for your used photo & video equipment.
3 comments Add comment Read comments Rate this article
In which our in-house experts submit their photos for you to ZAP.
By Adorama Learning Center Editors
September 3, 2010
Now it's your turn to critique shots by Jack, Mason, and the rest of the PhotoZAP team. Don't worry–we can take all the honest, constructive critiques you can throw our way. All we ask is that you keep in the spirit of ZAP and be honest, informative, and opinionated in your review.
The PhotoZAP critiques have quickly become one of the most popular features in the Adorama Learning Center. And while you may not always agree with us–shoot, oftentimes we can't agree with one another–you'll have to agree that the PhotoZAP critiques are a fun and informative way to help Adorama Learning Center fans and friends improve their photography.
And just to show you we can take critiques as well as we can give, we're introducing a new occasional feature, ZAP the ZAPPERS!
We're going to launch this with four ZAP the ZAPPERS shot by Jack Howard of Novak Djokavic at Day 3 of the the 2010 US Open Tennis tournament. (Thumbnails seen above.)
Let us know what you think!
Article
Search for related articles by topic:
.
Was this article helpful?
Rate this article
Post a comment
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Reader Rating and Comments
If this was an AP shot, then 3 is the best for DOF, composition and action. 4 is too far away and too distracting. 2 is missing a racket. Second choice would be 1. People don't understand that a photographer at a pro sports event is locked in to a position and the players are moving all over the place. Trying to keep the subject in focus and keep the DOF shallow to make the player stand out is tough. Composition relies on cropping.
by Photochic in South Carolina on September 6, 2010
These were tough shots to get I'm sure. In 1 the ball is competing with the flower bed (shooter ideally would have been to the left a bit), and in 4 the angle of the shot obscures what is taking place. Conversely, in 2 and 3, the subject is clear. That said, 3 stands out among the pack as filling the frame (though smack in the middle) and capturing the shot with a great expression by the subject. 4 is compositionally interesting in that it captures the anticipated connection between the ball and the player, but the DOF that captures the ball as sharp nonetheless rendered the player just slightly out of focus leaving the question as to whether in fact this was intentional. That is, either a longer DOF or a shorter DOF might have told a different story. And while it seems nit-picky, the shot of the players elbow doesn't seem too particularly interesting. A quarter of a second more might have shown more of the racket.
by Dale in California on September 5, 2010
Good shots all. Composition is good, color and contrast seem fine and the point of focus is perfect on all of them. If I would do something different, it would be shutter speed. While I appreciate the action blur, I just prefer an all around sharp shot. Great images
by kebwebs in Plymouth, MA on September 3, 2010
Get exclusive access to expert tips, special offers and coupons.