Adorama Camera
Adorama Learning Center
Techniques and How-Tos
PhotoZAP: We Critique Your Photos
Introducing ZAP the ZAPPERS!

Introducing ZAP the ZAPPERS!

Back to PhotoZAP: We Critique Your Photos page
Average: 5.0 stars
 

In which our in-house experts submit their photos for you to ZAP.

By

Now it's your turn to critique shots by Jack, Mason, and the rest of the PhotoZAP team. Don't worry–we can take all the honest, constructive critiques you can throw our way. All we ask is that you keep in the spirit of ZAP and be honest, informative, and opinionated in your review.


 

The PhotoZAP critiques have quickly become one of the most popular features in the Adorama Learning Center. And while you may not always agree with us–shoot, oftentimes we can't agree with one another–you'll have to agree that the PhotoZAP critiques are a fun and informative way to help Adorama Learning Center fans and friends improve their photography.

And just to show you we can take critiques as well as we can give, we're introducing a new occasional feature, ZAP the ZAPPERS!

 

Here's how this is going to work:

 

  • Every couple of weeks, we'll post a new ZAP the ZAPPERS piece with a shot made by one of the regular PhotoZAP critiquers.
  • The shot caption will include tech specs and any relevant post-production tweaks and adjustments. 
  • But it will not include the photographer's statement or self-critique. Instead, this information will have been sent to a different PhotoZAP editor for a period of at least one week or ten reader-submitted critiques; whichever comes first.
  • Here's the deal–we may love, hate, or be indifferent about the shot we've posted, and we don't want to pre-color the conversation, hence the hidden self-critique.
  • ZAP the ZAPPERS is meant to be taken in the same spirit of learning as our regular PhotoZAP critiques. Be brutally honest, be informative and entertaining, and have some fun with it!
  • Don't be abusive, offensive, or use foul and indecent language in the comments. These will be deleted immediately.
  • If you think a photo stinks, tell us why! Flex those creative muscles and explain why it doesn't work. Same goes for if you think a shot works!
  • Have fun!

 

 

 

We're going to launch this with four ZAP the ZAPPERS shot by Jack Howard of Novak Djokavic at Day 3 of the the 2010 US Open Tennis tournament. (Thumbnails seen above.)

 

 

Let us know what you think!

moreRelated Workshops

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

3 readers rated this article. Average rating: 5.0 stars
 
  • View
  • 3 comments
1 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
Wire choice

If this was an AP shot, then 3 is the best for DOF, composition and action. 4 is too far away and too distracting. 2 is missing a racket. Second choice would be 1. People don't understand that a photographer at a pro sports event is locked in to a position and the players are moving all over the place. Trying to keep the subject in focus and keep the DOF shallow to make the player stand out is tough. Composition relies on cropping.

by in South Carolina on

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
composition, color, depth of field

These were tough shots to get I'm sure. In 1 the ball is competing with the flower bed (shooter ideally would have been to the left a bit), and in 4 the angle of the shot obscures what is taking place. Conversely, in 2 and 3, the subject is clear. That said, 3 stands out among the pack as filling the frame (though smack in the middle) and capturing the shot with a great expression by the subject. 4 is compositionally interesting in that it captures the anticipated connection between the ball and the player, but the DOF that captures the ball as sharp nonetheless rendered the player just slightly out of focus leaving the question as to whether in fact this was intentional. That is, either a longer DOF or a shorter DOF might have told a different story. And while it seems nit-picky, the shot of the players elbow doesn't seem too particularly interesting. A quarter of a second more might have shown more of the racket.

by in California on

1 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
What's not to like

Good shots all. Composition is good, color and contrast seem fine and the point of focus is perfect on all of them. If I would do something different, it would be shutter speed. While I appreciate the action blur, I just prefer an all around sharp shot. Great images

by in Plymouth, MA on

Items per page
Showing 3 of 3 results
Bookmark this page