Remember to Print!

Back to TechTock page
Average of 5 ratings: 3.7 stars
 

5 comments Read comments Rate this article

I am concerned about the future of visual memories.

By Mason Resnick

April 4, 2011

Digital prints are easier and cheaper than ever. So why are so few photographers making prints?

Photo © Allkindza/iStockphoto.com

It's ironic: For professional photographers and enthusiasts, making accurate prints of your color or black-and-white images has never been easier. Ditto for consumers, who can easily upload their digital photos or bring them in to a kiosk at the local Big Box store or at the local drug store chain. You can print on demand now, rather than printing an entire roll, and the cost per print has dropped thanks to competition. In the 90s, a 4x6-inch print (the most popular size, by far) from a negative used to cost 40-50 cents. Now, consumer prints in the 15-20 cent range are typical. It should be a great time to make prints!

And yet, fewer people are printing. According to research conducted last year by PMA, only six out of ten digital camera owners bother to make prints, and 90% of pictures shot by those owners never get printed. These statistics do not factor in camera phone users, whose propensity for printing is even way less.

 

Sure, I share some of my photos on Facebook, as do millions of others (above is a screen shot of my profile Photos page). But I also share them by making prints (framed and otherwise) and photo books to give as gifts. Facebook should have a "print" option for every photo so you can order prints of your own photos, or allow your network to order prints as an option. Hey Zuckerberg, you listening?



What happens to the unprinted photos?

The answer is, usually, nothing. Sometimes, they simply disappear.

I look at my teenage daughters' picture-taking habits. Neither one of them has asked me to order prints for them, ever. I've offered. Instead, they take low-resolution pictures with their camera phones and share them on Facebook. There are plenty of good reasons to share images online with social networks of friends, co-workers and acquaintances, but the majority of the photos being shared on Facebook are the kind that used to find their way into the family album, and the family album is becoming, for too many people, a lost art, an heirloom that got drowned in pixels.

Facebook is currently home to the largest number of digital images today, but there's no “print” option. There should be. My concern is that the cloud computers where the images are stored could one day disappear. Facebook could go bankrupt and turn off its servers (not likely, but hey, it could happen. Anybody fly Pan Am lately?). Then what happens?

Hard copies of your most important photos—of loved ones, BFFs, people who pass through your life in memorable ways—should be treasured and kept.


Why are prints still valuable?

In an age where iPad portfolios, and easy-access and upload sharing sites abound, why bother making prints? Four years ago, I wrote about the important, powerful role prints—not digital versions that could be called up on a monitor—played in giving my father comfort during his last days, and how going through boxes of family photos helped me and my family through the grieving process when he was gone.

There is something about holding a print in your hands that is powerful, and more permanent, than viewing a photo on a web site, because the latter could be gone in the blink of an eye.

But you don't have to simply stuff small prints in a shoebox. There are other options out there. 

 

No need for a frame store or struggling with frames: You can order framed photos to your specs like these from AdoramaPix!

You don't have to make simple 4x6 prints, either. A few months ago, my cousin, a fellow photographer, sent me (via snail mail) a photo book he put together of him and his children on a recent visit to Israel. It was a more meaningful gift than if he had simply tagged me to look at the pictures on Facebook. When the Facebook photos are long forgotten, that book is still on my shelf and I can look at it any time. I recently sent my mom a couple of framed prints to hang on the wall of her condo in Florida. I simply added a framing option (AdoramaPIX has over 600 custom framing options!) when I placed the order. She loved it.

Here's Mark Wallace's video review of Adorama's Photo Books:




Greeting cards, gallery wraps and calendars are other ways you can get creative when printing and sharing physical photos. In other words, you've got options.

 

Another cool way to display photos on a wall is using a gallery wrap design, as shown here, also available at AdoramaPix.


So if making single prints is so yesterday for you, there are plenty of other options. Consider digital or manual scrapbooking as another way to show and share your work.

Even if all you use is a cell phone, you can still get prints made. Here's how: Make sure to take the pictures so that they end up on your camera phone's micro/miniSD card (a 2GB card costs as little as $10), then take out the card and put it in an SD card adapter. Take the card to your local kiosk, insert it into your card reader's SD slot, or if you have a printer that prints directly from SD cards, print that way. The quality will not be ideal, but it will be at least as good as what a previous generation was able to capture with a disc or 110 Instimatic film camera. For some snapshooters, that's enough, and it gives you hard copies.

As John Lennon once sang, you don't know what you've got until you lose it. Don't lose those memories! Make prints.

 


Connect with Mason Resnick on Facebook, Twitter, or his profile page at the Adorama Learning Center.


SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

5 readers rated this article. Average rating: 3.7 stars
 
  • View
  • 5 comments
0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Printing is Hard and Less Forgiving

I think printing for me is like film. It leaves very little room for error. If you send through a print and it isn't color balanced or sharpened right for print. Things won't look quite right. Maybe there needs to be that value add with prints (not an additional charge for more than the cost of the print), for someone at the print shop to do that. Giving you that peace of mind that it wasn't an automated system printing and instead will be a good print. There is that fear that you will send an image up to a printer and then pay a lot of money for something that comes back to you x days later and may not look the way you see it. I'm mostly referring to large prints in this regard. It's a tough sell in this instant image, big screen environment where people can use their 60+inch tv as a free picture frame that shows all their favorite images instead of just one. I won't deny that print looks better and creates a different mood. But it isn't as easy or cheap in comparison.

by nerdybails in San Francisco on April 24, 2012

1 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
youth

@amoz Young people don't defend this kind of statement because they do not yet have the foresight to realize that many things that matter little to them now may become vastly important through the lens of maturity. Remember, they are immortal (they think). The act of living will teach them that mortality is real and that the tangible, printed evidence of one's passage through life can be of dear value to them and for the generations they will not meet personally.

by yasky in NY on April 14, 2011

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
The role of imaging has changed

The role of imaging has changed. As the other poster said - you no longer buy cd or records. Why is the point of getting a print made, you cant share that on Facebook or Flickr. As with everything the role of an image has become, temporary & flexible - just as it has always been in a newspaper or magazine - made to share instantly and then discarded for the next one. I'm fine with that.

by Stardan in USA on April 4, 2011

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Some questions

I can apretiate the importance of having hard copies of the digital photos one takes (I mean DVDs ;) and a printed picture is allways something to treasure, but I think people these days are taking a lot more photos than in the past, specially with low res cell phones, since the availabilty of a camera is more practical and easy to have than ever before. Now, how many of those photos are "print-worthy"? a lot are blurred, out of focus, low res, with wrong color temp etc. Also sharing them is a lot easier in the digital realm. I'm 40 and I haven't printed in a long time, and even those that I printed are MIA atm

by GerHer in Tegucigalpa, Honduras on April 4, 2011

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
may be true, but...

Why are articles like these always written by the "older" generation? I don't see young people defending this kind of statements... so, I think it is mostly a nostalgia kind of thing (as we have seen in the photography as well as the music industry over the past decade), not something to worry about.

by amoz in Antwerp, Belgium on April 4, 2011

Items per page
Showing 5 of 5 results

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
Bookmark this page