Adorama Camera > Adorama Learning Center > Techniques and How-Tos > Composition and Exposure > Fine grain with higher ISOs? Humbug!

Fine grain with higher ISOs? Humbug!

Back to Composition and Exposure page
Average of 10 ratings: 2.0 stars
 

10 comments Read comments Rate this article

Even finer grain at lower ISOs is better

By Bryan Peterson

July 2, 2010

Recently, Nikon and Canon introduced high-end DSLRs capable of reaching ISO 102,800. These pro cameras claim amazingly good image quality at ISO 6400 or even more. The Internet was abuzz. But I don't share the enthusiasm.



Bookmark and Share


Why is this not good news? Sticker shock, for starters: When it comes to time to buy a Nikon D3s or other models (such as those found in our roundup of Best Low Light/High ISO DSLRs), I will be paying more for an innovation I will get little, if any, use from. (Perhaps it's a shocker, but I don't get free cameras from Nikon. I pay for all of my gear.) When will I ever use ISO 6400, 32,000, or 102,800?


Black cat=good luck! I followed this cat around the beautiful island of Santorinni, Greece for some five minutes until he crossed these colorful steps that led to several of the locals' homes. Hand-holding my D300 and 17-55mm lens using ISO 100 and 1/500 second shutter speed preset in anticipation, I got the shot. High ISO? Not necessary here!

I like to shoot in available light, outdoors, during pre-dawn and early morning, and again during the before, during and right after sunset. During that time, I shoot creative exposures, not correct exposures. I am looking for ways to story-tell and isolate. I look for motion-filled scenes and shoot them accordingly; freezing the action or implying the motion.

So, how is shooting ISO of 1600 going to help me isolate that one lone front-lit flower against a distracting background? It won't! In fact it will actually hurt my chances of making that happen. With my aperture set to f/5.6--the aperture needed for sufficiently shallow depth--with an ISO of 1600 my shutter speed needs to be at a whopping 1/12,800 second--yikes! At ISO of 800, I'd need 1/6,400 second and with ISO 400, 1/3,200 second is necessary.

No thanks. I'll take ISO 100 and a more reasonable 1/1200 sec.

If you wish to shoot indoor sports, (gymnastics, basketball and ice hockey for example) then by all means use higher ISO's.


Broken ankle in the making? I chose 1/1000 second and gladly left the camera in Aperture Priority Mode, keeping my eye on the aperture and adjusting it when necessary to make sure my shutter speed was always around a 1/1000 second. I also had my D300 and Nikon 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D lens mounted on a monopod. My ISO? You guessed it--100. (The kid's ankle survived intact.)


Bryan Peterson is a widely-published photographer and a successful commercial photographer for over 30 years, and runs the Perfect Picture School of Photography. He has photographed annual reports, corporate brochures and advertising campaigns for a diverse range of clients including Kodak, UPS, Intel, Microsoft, and Citibank. The most recent of his popular series of creativity and exposure books is "Understanding Shutter Speed: Creative Action and Low-Light Photography Beyond 1/125 Second." See his work at http://www.bryanfpeterson.com.

 

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

10 readers rated this article. Average rating: 2.0 stars
 
  • View
  • 10 comments
0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
WOW - Talk about a hard crowd

I thought it was only Australia where people flame others. Thank you Bryan for a lovely and informative article of your viewpoint on the modern camera offerings. To the flamer's, hey, what happened to the right to free speech I hear about your side of the ocean?? The man is simply writing an article about how the modern camera offerings will not work for his particular style and usage, which he is not only spot on the money with, but let us not forget what the internet is REALLY all about, a store of information for people to search and research. There will be a lot of newbies since this article, and into the future, who are looking to gain knowledge, not only will this be great for them, but will make them think "what am I really going to use my camera for?" before buying. Well done for yet another brilliant article as well as viewpoint.

by Tropicaltech in Cairns, Queensland, Australia - Up top down under on June 21, 2011

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Flash in rink

Hi Anthony in Hoboken. don't worry, you won't blind the players with your flash. They won't even notice it. i use two 580EX flashes now and will use three next winter. At a quarter power, the duration is what? A ten thousandth of a second? Push your ISO up to 6400 if you want, but the images will be flat, and those flashes make a world of difference (but you do have to get the flash off the camera)

by John in Hockeyland in Nova Scotia on May 18, 2011

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Terrible article

This article gives several examples and all of them are situations where there is ample light. I shoot with fast lenses and often find situations where my 55 f1.4 wide open requires 1/8s at ISO 100. Being able to shoot at ISO 3200 and above is a great thing. It allows you to get the shot, and that is the most important thing.

by seylerc in Corvallis, OR on February 17, 2011

1 of 2 people found this comment helpful
 
Was I supposed to be persuaded?

This is a very biased article. Having available light is fantastic when it's adequate, high iso is there to compensate for the lack of ambiance. You can't just say you don't like high iso shooting and ignore it's purpose, having high iso ability is a huge leap in photography, allowing people to shoot things that were not possible with film. If you are shooting in such fantastic light all the time, maybe consider venturing into new territory and really doing what modern technology allows.

by Steve in Michigan on February 1, 2011

2 of 3 people found this comment helpful
 
A waste of my time reading this.

Of course we all want to shoot with ample light. There are many situations were high ISOs are needed.

by States the obvious in Atlanta on January 15, 2011

1 of 3 people found this comment helpful
 
Totally agree with Bryan

shoot at lowest ISO if possible. The higher ISO, the more noise it produces when enlarged. Most of the time, I shoot my D300 with ISO <= 400.

by ForFun in Texas, US on November 17, 2010

3 of 4 people found this comment helpful
 
Great Article

Very usefull, and again, we clearly see the need to shot with the lowest ISO setting possible.

by Jay in PA on October 20, 2010

6 of 9 people found this comment helpful
 
That's the stupidest thing I've ever read.

Are you just trying to fill space? Try shooting at night then get back to us. Just because it's not useful to you doesn't mean it's not useful to me.

by nothing in pdx on July 2, 2010

7 of 7 people found this comment helpful
 
Unclear

Sorry Bryan, I don't understand your article. I don't wish to shoot with high ISO settings, ever! However there are lots of occasions when it is necessary. "No thanks. I'll take ISO 100 and a more reasonable 1/1200 sec." I think we all would if we could. Sometimes it's not possible.

by Dave in UK on July 2, 2010

6 of 6 people found this comment helpful
 
Confused

I get Bryan's point, but I guess I'm a little confused. Don't photographers all know to shoot at lower ISOs when possible? I don't mean this to come across as rude, but from people I've spoken to, I think we all get that those cameras are meant for extreme circumstances. If your shooting has no need for it, save your money for a nicer lens. For example, I tried to shoot outdoor hockey, a night game, with poor lighting. Even a f/1.8 lens had a tough time to get the action frozen in time. You can't use flash to blind players (small rink), so the only option is ISO boosts. My guess is you're targeting people that just want to shoot high to say they can? Then yes, I completely agree! Only shoot when high when you really have no choice. It's like trying to show off the technology more than your subject matter. Thanks for the writeup.

by Anthony in Hoboken on July 2, 2010

Items per page
Showing 10 of 10 results

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page