Adorama Camera > Adorama Learning Center > Gear Guides & Reviews > Product Reviews > Does the Panasonic GH1 Pass The Street Photography Stress Test?

Does the Panasonic GH1 Pass The Street Photography Stress Test?

Back to Product Reviews page
Average of 3 ratings: 4.5 stars
 

3 comments Read comments Rate this article

Let's see if it'll take Manhattan

By Mason Resnick

October 13, 2009

Panasonic’s second Micro Four Thirds claims to be responsive on the street. Let’s find out.


 

Clearly, the G1 not a Leica wannabe. Unlike so many small retro cameras being introduced this year, the Panasonic GH1 is very much of the digital world, and does not claim to be a “street” camera. But here's the irony: In reviewing the GH1, I felt it had the potential to outperform many recently-introduced cameras that have the street-camera look but not the guts or responsiveness. Why? Virtually no lag time, an essential ingredient for a street-smart camera.

With that in mind (and knowing that its sister camera, the G1, turned in a stellar street performance when I put it through its paces a few months abo), I took the GH1 into the streets of Manhattan and shot on the streets under heavy overcast skies which forced me to shoot at lower shutter speeds and higher ISOs than I prefer. But that’s the real world. How did the GH1 do?

Here’s what I learned.

 

Also read: Product Review: Panasonic Lumix GH1

 

Slide Show: Stress Test photos shot with the Panasonic GH1


Operation/Ergonomics

Controls are generally well placed, except for the video button, which is clumsily placed on the thumb rest. Guess what? My thumb rested on it, inadvertently activating video recording when I didn’t want it to. Fortunately, you can disable this button, which I did.

Manual focus requires a significant turn of the wrist, and the magnified center area is necessary since you can’t really tell if the image is in focus if you’re viewing it full-sized either on the LCD monitor or in the EVF. This is an awkward setup, and I found myself relying on the AF, which was very fast, silent, and accurate about 70-80 percent of the time in the subdued light.

Image Quality

Due to the low light conditions on the day that I Street-Tested the GH1, I shot exclusively at ISO 800. Even with that, my exposures ranged in the 1/200-1/360 range at f/4-5.6. Even so, I was able to make some pretty good-looking 8x10-inch prints and while some  digital noise was present, it was not objectionable when shooting in JPEG. (Other photos, shot in non-street photo conditions, showed excellent image quality at ISO 640 and below.)

Color was generally accurate, even when scenes were lit by street lights.

Performance

Here’s where the GH1 excells on the street: When set on the Q-AF mode, autofocus is silent and decisive in moderate daylight and lighter. It is a tad slower in lower light. Under optimal conditions, there is virtually no shutter lag—even when using autofocus! I was able to capture fast-changing scenes and swift subjects without any processing time getting in my way. An excellent performance.


Bottom line

As long as you turn off the thumb rest Video button, and shoot primarily using autofocus, the GH1 is very acceptable for street photography. It is fairly unobtrusive (in fact, it’s smaller than a Leica M camera), it has a quick shutter with virtually no lag time—and it shoots HD Videos. Based on its quick performance on the street, I think both the GH1 and the G1 would also be excellent choices for sports photography, photographing children, pets, and other fast-moving subjects.

Stress Test grade: B+

About The Author

Mason Resnick is the editor of the Adorama Learning Center and a lifetime photography enthusiast.

moreRelated Workshops

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

3 readers rated this article. Average rating: 4.5 stars
 
  • View
  • 3 comments
0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
GH1 has Lexus style

The gold and the resemblance of he hump to Lexus' fondness for rounded trunk hoods come to mind. Too bad it doesn't have antishake like Olympus.

by Swingline in Virginia on October 13, 2009

2 of 2 people found this comment helpful
 
Great street test!

I especially like #5. Cool shot, expression. The images illustrate that this camera can really stop action. Anyone who thinks they "sux" doesn't get street photography or why these photos do a good job illustrating what the camera can do in low light. And no, not every camera can catch action like this because many digital cameras have lag time.

by Mr. Coughee in Atlanta on October 13, 2009

2 of 4 people found this comment helpful
 
the pix really sux

you can get that with any kind of camera - oh yes but these are in focus

by vaffanculo in burundi on October 13, 2009

Items per page
Showing 3 of 3 results

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page