Adorama Camera > Adorama Learning Center > Techniques and How-Tos > PhotoZAP > PhotoZAP 1: Flash Blindness

PhotoZAP 1: Flash Blindness

Back to PhotoZAP page
Average of 10 ratings: 3.7 stars
 

10 comments Read comments Rate this article

Our critics praise and pan your pictures

By Adorama Learning Center Editors

October 19, 2009

“This photo is an example of too much strobe, too much reliance on equipment over aesthetics.”
— Monica Cipnic


Photo © Susannah Storch, Longmont, CO. Gear: Canon Digital Rebel XT with 28-135mm lens at 28mm setting, Canon 580 EXII flash. Exposure: 1/200 sec at f/14, ISO 100.

Photographer's statement:“I wanted to create some drama. The shot was taken on Long Island, NY while I was on vacation from Longmont, CO. With the harsh blue sky days we constantly have out west, I was happy to have East Coast light and clouds to shoot under.”


Our critics say:

Jack Howard: This shot feels like a composited image. Note I say "feels like." I don't doubt that it's a single in-camera exposure but there's just so many disconnects between the foreground subject and the background. The crop/framing right through the forearm is unsettling, and there's zero engagement with the subject. I'm reckoning the fill light–which should have been dialed back at least a half stop–comes from a small strobe, judging by the "sunburst" on the sunglasses (with a 6-bladed lens set smallish aperture f/8-f/11ish), since the background isn't bathed in warm, directional early or late-day golden light, but is rather just blah, flat blues and greys. I'd be interested to see what upping the background exposure and dialing back the foreground fill would do to change the overall color and textural feel of this image.

Monica Cipnic: Jack’s right: There’s a detachment between the subject and the background.  Everything about this photo is intense, but not necessarily in a good sense--the intensity of the contrast between the overwhelming black/darkness of the entire photo and the subject's face and especially the flash reflection in his sunglasses don't add up. This photo is an example of too much strobe, too much reliance on equipment over aesthetics. We can see the background scene over the subject's shoulder, and just about make out that the sun is in it's midday brightness, which can account for why Jack and other viewers would say that this looks like a composite image---the light coming from different directions, the flash reflection and then the background, doesn't make for a unified image, it's visually confusing.

Mason Resnick: It takes a lot of skill, thought and planning to make an image as visually disjointed as this one. The ratio of strobe-to-ambient light must be at least 2-3 stops, maybe even more. The result is jarring. Clearly the photographer was going for dramatic impact, but this overdoes it. Less is more, and I think a more subtle darkening of the background, perhaps one stop darker than the subject, would have given this photo a dramatic look without overpowering it.

 

What do you think? Leave a comment!

Want to be Zapped? Learn how here!

Next Zap

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

10 readers rated this article. Average rating: 3.7 stars
 
  • View
  • 10 comments
0 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
A contrarian view

The critical advice is exellent for producing a technically well executed ... boringly ordinary image. To me it's an interesting image *because* it visually breaks the rules. Had it been technically "correct" it would be hopelessly mundane.

by Auntipode in New Zealand on October 27, 2009

1 of 2 people found this comment helpful
 
It's a

You wanted to create drama. Bless you for trying! But technique should always serve the message. The problem here is not HOW to achieve drama, but WHAT drama to achieve? I think you weren't really clear on what you wanted the photo to say. What do you want us to feel or experience in viewing this photo? As Lou said, where is the narrative? Who is this person? What is he feeling? What is his connection to this place? What does he see? Can we see it thru him? His expression is blank and neutral. So are his hair, clothing, sunglasses, the background and camera angle. How does that fit with a lighting choice that is harsh and intense? Are you capturing the essence of a person, moment, place, feeling, idea? Compare Ansel Adams' famous picture of Georgia O'Keefe. Harsh light on a harsh face, camera angle very low, intense eyes. We feel how Ansel felt being in her presence. Keep practicing technique, so when you know what you want the photograph to say, you'll know how to say it.

by JD in Montrose Colorado on October 22, 2009

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Framing

I agree with the critiques. The framing bothers me. He is looking out of the picture. I would rather the lighting was more balanced. The background is too dark. Thanks for the lesson.

by cricket in Sebastopol, Ca on October 21, 2009

1 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
Horizon

The slanted horizon is very distracting too.

by pitchursnapr in Ohio on October 20, 2009

1 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
East Coast Light?

It seems to me all the East coast light you were so happy to be shooting in was lost by the heavy handed use of flash here. There was already enough drama in the clouds to resist spreading your exposures between foreground and background to this extreme. My guess is you've recently discovered off camera flash. As a rule, when someone discovers a new tool they tend to use it for everything and with gusto rather than finesse. Subtlety will come with practice though.

by carlos in Arizona on October 19, 2009

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
You caught us!

Photog237 and ARM are correct in being suspicious of the f/1.4. It should have read f/14. Just wanted to make sure you were paying attention. ;-) I will fix the text.

by Mason Resnick, Learning Center Editor in New York, NY on October 19, 2009

1 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
Thumbs Down

I'm not one that thinks that it is necessary to "engage" the subject as Jack Howard does so that's the least of the problems this photo has. The darkened background in what is clearly broad daylight is either an error or an affectation- it just does not work to enhance the photo. The subject is technically ok- properly exposed and sharply focused. But what is the point of it? It has no narrative line nor anything insightful or interesting about it. I'd be curious to know what the photographer was thinking about when taking the photo- what was the reason he decided to take it?

by Lou H in Brooklyn, NY on October 19, 2009

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
1/200 @ f1.4?

I agree with what the critics say and question if the actual shutter speed and aperture is correct in the image. Assuming that it is near or just past noonday, even using the sunny 16 rule would put this at 1/100 (iso 100) at f16, or 1/200 at f8 (not f1.4). Dramatic, maybe, but part of having drama is to be able to tell what is in the background (or have it near black). I think a step or two back (to get the entire arm in the photo) and balancing the background would make it much better. The photographer did state how nice it was to have the clouds, but they are terribly under-exposed.

by Photog237 in Pennsylvania on October 19, 2009

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Interesting review with good suggestions!

Jack's point of increasing the background exposure is good - however, since it appears to be rather busy, would it become too distracting? Perhaps also stepping back a bit and using the zoom to blur it a bit more? I notice that a small aperture was already used (f 1.4), so compressing it with the zoom would help to soften the background a bit more.

by ARM in CA on October 19, 2009

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Educationally helpful

I liked the comments because I learned from them. They were offering tips, with rationale, while not overly arrogant. They gave me something I can use.

by Jshot in Kansas on October 19, 2009

Items per page
Showing 10 of 10 results

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page