Adorama Camera > Adorama Learning Center > Techniques and How-Tos > PhotoZAP > PhotoZAP 13: A Whole Lot of Sole

PhotoZAP 13: A Whole Lot of Sole

Back to PhotoZAP page
Average of 3 ratings: 5.0 stars
 

3 comments Read comments Rate this article

Our critics praise and pan your pictures

By Adorama Learning Center Editors

November 16, 2009

“This photo is strange and unsettling, and at the same time it is peaceful and familiar.”—Jack Howard


 

© Pedro Garcia. Gear: Canon EOS 50D, Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens, handheld. Exposure: 1/50 sec, f/6.3, Sepia added in post-processing.

Photographer’s statement: “This is a photograph of my seven year old daughter’s feet while she was relaxing on our living room couch.  The sun was falling at the moment I took the image and since the living room has a large window, I felt the lighting was perfect for this picture.”


Our critics say...


Jack Howard: This photo is strange and unsettling, and at the same time it is peaceful and familiar. As a form study, the sepiatone effect is well used. I'm not crazy about the hot spot on the background in lower right, which sucks the eyes away from the main focus. I’d also like a little more directional light on the flat of the top foot, which is just a lot of dead space, but with a wee bit more angular light, it would be better defined. Here's a good chance to get quick and creative with makeshift objects used as reflectors and gobos to address the two main light-related issues: Top foot needs light, background lower right light needs blocking.

Monica Cipnic: When I first looked at this photo, I wanted to view it as vertical—both from the angle of the child's feet and the angle of light, since the photographer writes that the light is from a large window, this seems more plausible. I like the meditative sense of the image, the composition, use of sepia and the lighting, particularly the sole of the foot in shadow seems almost sculptural, as if in marble. I do agree with Jack that the hot spot to the right--or top of the image if you see this as a vertical-- is distracting and cropping it out would strengthen the photograph overall.

Mason Resnick: Indeed, this photo was submitted as a horizontal, so I must assume that’s how the photographer intended it. But it should be a vertical. To avoid chiropractor visits from turning my head, I’ve rotated it (right). The distracting bright background object is still distracting. I also note that this shot is quite noisy. We don’t have ISO information but I think we can safely assume this was shot at too high an ISO. Your subject isn’t going anywhere, so put the camera on a tripod, use the lowest ISO setting you can, and try again.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

3 readers rated this article. Average rating: 5.0 stars
 
  • View
  • 3 comments
0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Monica and Mason has got it right

Fully agree with Monica and Mason that the vertical format is so much better. The distracting white patch should not have been there. Mason's vertical rendering makes a huge difference!

by PiRIUS in Melbourne, Australia on February 5, 2010

1 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
Very useful tips

I found the analyses of the photo very useful and helpful in improving my own techniques.

by jesumjr in Philippines on November 17, 2009

1 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
Toe Tag

Unsettling is correct. All that is required to make the photo complete is a "toe tag".

by Gary in Corpus Christi, TX on November 17, 2009

Items per page
Showing 3 of 3 results

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page