Adorama Camera > Adorama Learning Center > Techniques and How-Tos > PhotoZAP > PhotoZAP 15: Lost in a Fog

PhotoZAP 15: Lost in a Fog

Back to PhotoZAP page
Average of 3 ratings: 3.0 stars
 

3 comments Read comments Rate this article

Our critics praise and pan your pictures

By Adorama News Writer

November 20, 2009

“The fisherman was placed dead center, and the image lacks punch.”—Mason Resnick


 

© Phil Burt, Benton, KY. Gear: Nikon D90, Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG Macro HSM II lens, tripod mounted, Acratech head. Exposure: 1/160 sec at f/2.8, ISO 200, manual exposure.

Photographer’s statement: “Wow, for an amateur photographer this is a big deal! We were staying at a friend’s lake house, Located at Lake Lemon,  about 20 miles north east of Bloomington, In. At 5:28 a.m., while out shooting, I spotted a lone fisherman appearing through the fog and thought that this would make a great photo. I changed lenses and took this photo. I think that it does have some good qualities and by having it professionally critiqued will be a big asset to me, another reason is I really like it.”


Our critics say...


Mason Resnick: This shot fails for two reasons: The fisherman was placed dead center, and the image lacks punch. I prefer composing in-camera and not relying on cropping after the fact; simply re-composing the image at 200mm with the boat placed at the intersection of the bottom right “golden thirds” corner would have helped. Look at the histogram for this shot in Photoshop—move the sliders on the right and left so the curve isn’t surrounded by dead space. I did this with the image (even though I broke my own rule about cropping). See the difference?

Monica Cipnic: I like the solitary, foggy and meditative mood of this photo, and wouldn't want to 'punch it up' as much as Mason suggests. I agree that taking the fisherman off dead center would  make it stronger. And if you haven't already done so, since your camera is on a tripod  and where the subject is not moving dramatically, 'work the scene'-- zoom your lens to get alternate compositions and exposures in camera, and check your histogram.

Jack Howard: I'm actually very OK with the framing in this shot. The canoeist is sort of close to dead center, but there's a very nice symmetry of scale and division of space that makes this work for me. Look at the water and tree line, which falls squarely on the top third line when the frame is divided into the nine larger rectangles. And then look where the canoe hits the water when the center rectangle is then recursively looked at with the rule of thirds overlay (see below): perfectly on the bottom third dividing line.  And yes, this is a very low-contrast scene, that that adds to the feel of this image in many ways–but it does need a little more "pop", which a curves adjustment layer with about 75 opacity can give to spread the histogram and set more definitive black and white points without scorching the foggy morning twilight feel out of this nice scene.


What do you think? Leave a comment!

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

3 readers rated this article. Average rating: 3.0 stars
 
  • View
  • 3 comments
0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
50/50

I mostly agree with Sportymonk about Mason's exposure adjustment, the dark blues and greens are distractingly strong. But, I like Mason's crop. Given Mason's crop, and Jack's exposure, I think its a great shot.

by Jake Jones in Vegas, Baby! Vegas! on March 24, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Not that bad

I disagree with Mason's treatment of the sky, way to dark. The focus was the fog and the dark blue sky takes away from that. I do think some cropping by bringing in the bottom right corner would help eliminate some of the foreground. (Get rid of the beach.) Otherwise, it achieves what was desired, the lostness or wandering of the fog.

by Sportymonk in Rocky Mount NC on March 8, 2010

2 of 2 people found this comment helpful
 
Wow

Perhaps some critics might want to use the word "fail" a little less freely. While the shot can be improved -- as most shots can -- it certainly didn't "fail"

by Rex in KS on November 20, 2009

Items per page
Showing 3 of 3 results

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page