Adorama Camera > PhotoZAP 30: Tequila Sunset

PhotoZAP 30: Tequila Sunset

Back to PhotoZAP page
Average of 12 ratings: 4.3 stars
 

12 comments Read comments Rate this article

Our critics praise and pan your pictures

By Adorama Learning Center Editors

January 21, 2010

“What's not to love about a perfectly executed silhouette shot against a gorgeous sky?” —Jack Howard


 

Bookmark and Share

© Steve Brown, Mesa, AZ. Gear: Nikon D70, Nikkor 80-200mm lens at 80mm. Exposure: 1/160 sec at f/2.8, ISO 200, aperture priority. Handheld.

Photographer’s statement: This photo was result of an impromptu drive through the desert after a thunderstorm, in Usery Mountain Park. The camera was an afterthought that happened to be in the trunk. I really like the vibrant colors and composition of the photo and would be very interested in an objective critique with goal of becoming a better photographer; it's great to hear how others may think it's a good photo but there's always room for improvement

Our critics say...   


Mason Resnick:
This photo is proof that you should always have your camera with you, because you never know. Sunsets can be tricky, but the photographer handled the exposure well. I might have placed the cactus a little bit away from the edge—remember the rule of thirds—and shot it from a lower angle so more of it would break the horizon, but otherwise, I like this one. I also agree with the theatrical wide aspect ratio crop.

Jack Howard: What's not to love about a perfectly executed silhouette shot against a gorgeous sky? I too like the HD aspect ratio and have to agree with possibly trying for a lower angle, but I’m not sure if that's possible. Would love to see what the saturation looks like in a bracketed set of captured images–not necessarily for HDRI, but for finding perhaps a slightly different balance in sky color and detail. But as it stands, this is a winner.

Monica Cipnic: A dramatic sunset in the desert is always a compelling subject and the photographer captured it well. My suggestions are in agreement with Mason and Jack: moving your position so that the cactus isn't so close to the right edge, if you could try a lower angle, and “work the scene,” as we often say.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

12 readers rated this article. Average rating: 4.3 stars
 
  • View
  • 12 comments
0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Beautiful Shot

I think the comp was great and I don't think I would crop the shot at all in this case.

by Robert Henderlong in Tucson, AZ on July 22, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Excellent

If you put the cactus to center you cut off a brighter prettier portion.

by jiro in NC on July 21, 2010

1 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
perfect composition

I think the composition can hardly be improved. The cactus is in the darker area in the right, balancing the darker left. From the left of the cactus the red light gets ever brighter until it hits the darker left 1/4, a dramatic change at that point. Going lower would just lengthen the cactus, overpowering the composition and drawing the eye even more to the cactus. I totally disagree with cropping out the left side, it is a wonderful balance to the darker right and moves your eye to the center 1/2, where the drama (light) is. I think the photographer has a good sense of composition and balance. Sorry all you critics.

by wolf in old saybrook CT on July 21, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Crop and more crop ..............

A good photo. But like others I found that while the cactus adds perspective, it also competes too much. I found cropping out the left third and cropping down to make the cactus taller gives a more interesting and balanced shot. Doing that hides the brighter parts of the sunset but hints at their existence thus adding interest. The mountains and cactus then support and frame the beautiful red sunset without competing with it.

by HClarkx in Sacramento on July 21, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
I aggree with the critics completely

Firstly, if you can remove the left ¼ of the image then that part of the image is unnecessary and only detracts from the subject and other supporting elements. When you cover up this portion of the image then your eye does not flow from the sunset to the cactus, instead, it jumps from one to the other and becomes tiresome. Your eye goes from one side of the frame to the other and then back again. It is because the subject and main supporting element now occupy extreme left and right of the image and we as viewers naturally want to link these too elements closer together in order to form a better whole. If you either move the elements closer together, or, add something to the scene that links the two elements then the eye will not jump around, but flow. In this case, moving the cactus closer to the sunset and increasing its size, would have helped the image.

by Rick Hicks in Clearwater, Fl on March 2, 2010

7 of 8 people found this comment helpful
 
Rule of thirds? Really?

There is a reason why the cactus is on the far right. The main interest point of the picture is its brightest part -the sunset, not the cactus. Moving the cactus to the left, to fit the rule, would make it competing with the sunset. Just cover the left half (slightly less) of the picture and you will see it by yourself – your eyes will play ping-pong between the sunset and the cactus. Moving the cactus to the right (just as it is on the picture) lets the viewer concentrate first on the main part of the picture – the sunset, leaving the cactus for later. The picture is balanced. The balance is mainly between the bright flames of the sunset against the cactus. Oh, why I have to disagree with the critics again…

by Zereoo in Tampa on February 12, 2010

0 of 4 people found this comment helpful
 
Not enough cactus

The pic does look a bit colour corrected but that's not what this is about. There isn't enough saguaro for my taste (just an opinion, right?) and the weeds at left are disconcerting. Are the edges of the hills and the cactus a bit too USM'd? Keep practicing!

by Sultan of Cognac in Southwestern France on January 27, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Lost in a cactus

A blend of horizon and sky is truly a good picture, I have read about the cactus not prominence in the picture, but it is placement a bit more to the center would of been nice but for the depth of field for the horizon and the sky to pop off the page with the silhouette of the cactus helps

by tadshort in Maricopa, AZ. on January 26, 2010

0 of 4 people found this comment helpful
 
Two Whines

* Don't like the extreme offset of the cactus. * Am not thrilled by the wispy "weeds" in left hand side of the silhouette. For me they come off out of scale.

by DogBreath in Silicon Valley, Ca on January 26, 2010

0 of 4 people found this comment helpful
 
PhotoZAP 30:Tequila Sunset

I have no way of knowing whether the picture has been "PhotoShopped" or not. But it looks like it has, which from my point of view, takes away from the natural look. I agree about the spacing in the prior comments.

by Frankj in Honolulu on January 26, 2010

Items per page
Showing 10 of 12 results
Page:

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page