Adorama Camera > Adorama Learning Center > Techniques and How-Tos > PhotoZAP > PhotoZAP 34: Stranger in the Night

PhotoZAP 34: Stranger in the Night

Back to PhotoZAP page
Average of 19 ratings: 3.5 stars
 

19 comments Read comments Rate this article

Our critics praise and pan your pictures

By Adorama Learning Center Editors

February 4, 2010

"I can’t see, from a technical perspective, how the photographer pulled this off as a single shot." —Mason Resnick


 

Bookmark and Share

© Peter W. Marks, Edwardsvsille, IL. Gear: Canon 20D, Canon 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 zoom lens at 85mm. Exposure: f/8 at 1/100 sec, ISO 800, aperture priority.

Photographer’s Statement: “I was sitting on the platform at Reading, UK railway station and this train was pulling away from the platform opposite. The young lady moved to the window and stared across at me. It so reminded me of a movie scene that even while fumbling in my bag for the camera I was composing a title "Night train to London"; "Passing Strangers'; or taking me back 50 years  to a real life experience "The Parting." And we never did meet again.”

 

 

Our critics say…   


Jack Howard:
This shot puzzles me. I see a story in this. The expression is great and the moment speaks volumes. It is a very intriguing image. But I've looked at this shot up-close and dug deep into the pixels and simply cannot figure out how this is a single-shot image: If the subject is moving along with the train, she, too, should show some motion blur, shouldn't she? The only way I can reckon this is a single frame involves participation of the subject with a remotely triggered strobe inside the train with a very short flash duration. I'm puzzled. I like the shot, and I'm OK with it as a potential composite...but just puzzled.

Mason Resnick: I’m with Jack: This is a wonderful, intriguing, mysterious image and a great moment…but I can’t see, from a technical perspective, how the photographer pulled this off as a single shot. It appears as if the girl in the train was “flown” in via Photoshop, or the overall image was sharp and the train was deliberately selectively blurred in post-processing to give the appearance of motion. Perhaps Mr. Marks will enlighten us in the comments.

Monica Cipnic: I agree with Jack and Mason: Technically, there are questions if this is a single shot, and how is the woman sharp while everything else is blurred with movement? Perhaps the photographer had the good luck to have a large reflective surface/object in the station—a metallic post, glass reflecting the sun, or such--so that the woman's face is so well lit. There is much to like about this particularly cinematic and memorable image. I would think about cropping it, either some off the top and bottom. or even more off the bottom so that the woman's face and enigmatic expression is more prominent in the frame.

 

What do you think? Leave a comment!

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

19 readers rated this article. Average rating: 3.5 stars
 
  • View
  • 19 comments
0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
A number of questions...

I can see what you were attempting to convey when producing this image, but I have a number of concerns and questions. 1st you mention that the young lady moved to the back of the train and then stared at you. Did you know she was going to look in your direction and that's why you instantly grabbed your camera out of your bag or did the subway car happen to pull away slower than the average train would and gave you ample time to set your camera to the specified settings? Question 2, why is it that the glass of the larger window not match that of the window in which we find the young lady? In addition to that, why do the lighting conditions between the two windows not match? Finally, could you provide a link to the un-edited version of the file? I'm sure this would help eliminate many of the questions people are attempting to answer themselves. BTW, I don't simply mean the question as to whether or not this is PS'd, as that has already been answered. Thank you, in advance.

by Munky in Glendale, CA on August 6, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Possible but not likely

The women is steping forward at the precise speed of the panning photog that is panning slower than the train.- I recently caught my son jumping into the water and still do not know how I lucked out. I'm still thinking composite though.

by rudagray in NJ/NYC on August 5, 2010

2 of 3 people found this comment helpful
 
Much ado about nothing.

Hey guys, this is about art, not photo journalism. It represents a story and there is no need or requirement for absolute truth. One shot or ten to create the image…who cares.

by Panoman in Texas on August 4, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Stranger in the Night

My guess is that the train was moving to the left and she was walking to the right which could easily have made her appear still and the train blurred.

by Luther in Nashville, TN on August 4, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
:)

This is one cool photograph...or two?

by movieman63 in East Tennessee on March 31, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Just a guess

If I were trying to recreate this shot I would use a long exposure coupled with a flash to freeze her, then use PS to remove the subsequent blur or her figure

by Vic in Ft. Myers Fl. on March 10, 2010

1 of 2 people found this comment helpful
 
Who Cares?

I think the shot is briliiant whatever technique was used. The end result is the aim.

by Jay Bee in Australia on February 25, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
psssttttt.....

I like it..... =)

by Texas Dan in Hill Country, TX on February 20, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Stranger in the night

I'm just wondering if a similar image could have been taken with the young women moving inside and panning her? If so you wouldn't need the photo shop would you?

by Stu in USA Wisconsin on February 12, 2010

4 of 4 people found this comment helpful
 
No problem, Pete!

Not a problem--we did not have a clear rule in place regarding Photoshop manipulations of submitted images when you submitted this shot. We do now. I appreciate your honesty in 'fessing up. I would say that in this case, your use of the blur filter did indeed improve the image!

by Mason Resnick, Editor, Adorama Learning Center in New York, NY on February 11, 2010

Items per page
Showing 10 of 19 results
Page:

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page