Print This Page
Customers most agreed on the following attributes:
from Southern NJ on 1/24/2011
Comments about Print File Print File Archival Workbox, 3 Ring Binder Box with a Carry Handle, 2-1/2" Deep, 1.5" D-ring, Black:
Bought these before & will buy again. They work well for me.
from Pacifica, CA on 11/2/2009
Comments about Print File Print File Archival Workbox, 3 Ring Binder Box with a Carry Handle, 2-1/2" Deep, 1.5" D-ring, Black:
I wish there was a model with larger rings, more capacity.
The snap closures look flimsy, but I haven't had one break yet.
The handle sometimes comes loose when I open the box.
from Ketchikan on 2/21/2009
Comments about Print File Print File Archival Workbox, 3 Ring Binder Box with a Carry Handle, 2-1/2" Deep, 1.5" D-ring, Black:
I am using this for archival storage of negatives. Working good so far. I am a little iffy about the handle supporting much weight. The case is also a little difficult to close with the handle attached. Other than this the case seems to be working great.
from Pleasanton, CA on 12/29/2008
Comments about Print File Print File Archival Workbox, 3 Ring Binder Box with a Carry Handle, 2-1/2" Deep, 1.5" D-ring, Black:
I really like this sealed binder as an archive for 120 and 35mm negatives. I can think of two main advantages over a standard 3-ring binder: (1) it closes without exposing the pages, keeping stray dust out of your archive (2)when it is closed, it seals as a plastic box and does not allow shear forces to stress your negatives and other inserted pages. The design is spartan- it is a rigid plastic case with an internal D-ring. This is not a fancy archiving tome that will dazzle your digital friends with your analog mysticism. It is a functional archiving system for negatives. I would pick something prettier if used to store prints.
from San Francisco, CA on 2/5/2007
Comments about Print File Print File Archival Workbox, 3 Ring Binder Box with a Carry Handle, 2-1/2" Deep, 1.5" D-ring, Black:
It has perfect size and carrying handle.