KODAK Kodacolor Gold 400 GC Color Negative Film ISO 400, 35mm Size, 36 Exposure,

2014-07-05T21:00:00

I have used Kodak Ultramax under a variety of conditions and it has almost always given me good results. I prefer Ultramax over Fuji 400 because the color tones and rendition given are so much closer to real life than Fuji. Fuji in my eye tends to have very saturated colors and brings out the blue a lot more than Kodak. I have a Canon film scanner and this film scans relatively well although not as well as Portra 400 or Ektar 100. Both Portra and Ektar are professional films so that is to be expected. Still with that in mind I am satisfied with the results from the Ultramax I have scanned. The only problem I have had with this film is it can tend to be a little flat and grainy when a long exposure is done. This film also is very affordable and the 36 exposure rolls are extremely nice. Overall this is a great film.

TED B.

2014-05-19T21:00:00

My husband is still old school and loves his camera that uses film. He still enjoys the element of surprise when he gets his pictures developed. It is hard to come by film these days. I was searching for film on line a few years ago and came across this site (Adorama)and found Kodak 400 speed film at a great price. I have been ordering from them now for years at the best price with no issues.

MomaJack

2013-03-25T21:00:00

I enjoy this film, as it works in any situation, motion or stillshots, an you can't beat the price!

Soli Y.

2012-12-12T19:00:00

If you have a classic 35mm camera, this is a good choice for an all around film. The 400 speed works well under a variety of lighting conditions, and the grain is much better than the film we used back when those cameras were new. The price is right, too! Hopefully Kodak (or someone) will continue to produce film for when we want to excercise our classic cameras!

JEFFREY B.

2012-07-15T21:00:00

Have always liked Kodak film. Thank you.

Linda