Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens

2020-06-22T14:56:41

Love this lens. Very sharp images. Great for photography.

Cherise H.

2020-06-22T13:39:05

the only added things in this bundle that were useful were the filters, case and lens. Others could keep or lose. Honestly just gonna give them away or resell them as they really aren't of any use to me.

KATHERINE Q.

2020-06-22T13:28:55

Images look nice. Would recommend a basic filter pack for evenly exposed images. Still learning the perks & quirks of this lens but so far I'm very satisfied. Should be expected with a lens this long, but note that your camera with this lens will likely not fit in a typical single camera case (at least not mine) Best price for a lens of this range & quality.

KATHERINE Q.

2020-01-09T00:38:36

Excellent lens . Very quick focus and sharpness.

j.Michael H.

2019-10-12T20:00:00

I have owned this lens for a long time. I purchased it because of its versatility, it give very sharp images, it’s not to heavy, and built like a tank. It’s an excellent alternative to the more expensive ones like the I.S. and the 2.8 version. It’s also lighter. You simply can’t beat it for the price. A great grab and go lens.

CSB

Originally posted at

2019-03-23T18:26:45

This is based on " Most liked Negative Review". The poster is not very knowledgeable of telephoto lenses. This lens, with or without IS, is one of the sharpest lenses out on the market today. Do your homework. If you want a lens with little "wiggle" at the long end, get an IS lens. If you want to shoot landscapes, you will get compressed images, the lens isn't made to shoot landscapes close up. If you want low light images, the f/2.8 is the lens, with IS to shoot with for consistent low light images. Dont complain about a lens that takes amazing photographs in day lit situations when you wanted one that shoots well in low light. You, not the lens is the issue. You want a low light, image stabilized lens for the price of a standard lens. Know what you want before spending your money on something you're not informed about, and convey that information to your sales person. The specifications on the length of the lens would have immediately told you it's not for NFL games. The 70-300 is, only because it extends to longer than 6". Again, be informed, do your homework before buying a lens. It's called Caveat Emptor--Let the Buyer Beware. I own both lenses, they are professional grade tools.

Mark H.

2019-01-30T11:28:10

Just an FYI... The color of the lens barrel is NOT exactly as you see on the photos! It is more of a Taupe or Sand color...Totally off from the photos seen. Besides that, it’s a good lens!

RENE J.

2019-01-01T07:43:21

I received my lens in great condition. The lens is amazingly sharp and so far my photos are beautiful. The price was great at Adorama. I would recommend to anyone. It will make a difference in your photos.

Heather F.

2018-12-30T19:00:00

Impressive lens. A manageable weight and tack sharp photos - even without image stabilization. I am extremely pleased with my purchase!

MsMundane

Originally posted at

2018-12-30T19:00:00

Impressive lens. A manageable weight and tack sharp photos - even without image stabilization. I am extremely pleased with my purchase!

Ms M.

Originally posted at

2018-12-19T04:42:46

Good package. Fast shipping

Yong Z.

2018-12-17T13:18:59

Love this lens! Perfect wedding ceremony lens. Will be using quite a bit in the future.

Denise D.

2018-12-13T13:07:54

Bought this to go with a Sony a7lll with MC-11 adapter. Works great.

Greg B.

2018-12-13T09:44:30

This is an awesome lens for the money. It produces very sharp images, auto focus is fast and it is much lighter than the f2.8 version. If you’re into landscape photography, this is a much better option since you will be using a tripod anyway.

Arnulfo G.

2018-12-11T13:32:30

Amazing lens I bought for landscape photography and I use it for studio portraits and I did get beautiful results. Definitely recommend!

HANI A.

2018-11-25T13:07:11

A great portrait lens with a good price. Nice and sharp.

SCOTT D.

2018-11-15T19:00:00

After many frustrations with my older off-brand telephoto zoom I decided to take the plunge and go Canon for my Canon SD60. What a delight to use!

Birder

Originally posted at

2018-09-20T10:32:58

I'm falling in love with lens, I took used this lens at the zoo and am totally amazed by the shots I was able to get!

Christi G.

2018-09-11T08:31:57

This is arguably one of the best lenses I've ever owned. At decent distances -- say 100-200 feet or more from your subject, the lens captures remarkable detail and explosive color. It's also a tough, sturdy lens that looks like it could take a beating (not that you'd actually want that but you get what i'm saying.) As a heads up, using a relatively light Canon 77D, the lens adds some heft but it's still worth it.

William H.

2018-07-18T20:00:00

I love this lens. It has taken my photography to a new level. If you don't have an l series lens you should get one. The difference is amazing.

Vic5

Originally posted at

2018-07-01T12:27:00

Honestly this lens is amazing! Every single picture i have taken has came out crisp and nice! I use it with my Rebel T6 a lot for landscape and portraits and it hasn't been disappointing at all! I would highly recommend it for people who want to up their game in photography. :)

RUBY S.

2018-05-24T13:10:01

Just Awesome! Awesome !

SENECA W.

2018-05-18T05:37:45

I been doing photography for years, this lens is awesome ........

SENECA W.

2018-01-05T08:10:12

I originally owned the IS version of this lens. I sold it to a friend that loved this lens more than I did. However, a few months later I regretted it and decided to save some money and purchased the non IS version. 99% of my work is done on a tripod as I am a Landscape and Seascape photographer. On the shots without my tripod, as long as I shoot the reciprocal of the focal length and use good technique, photos come out sharp. I used the money saved to fund a trip to the Columbia Gorge.

JOEY D.

2017-12-15T08:13:54

This is my third EF 70-200mm lens. The first was dropped, the second was stolen. This is a fast lens and will not let you down.

Mark I.

2017-12-12T15:47:56

Back in the days of film, we didn't have image stabilization, only a steady hand, which is why that doesn't concern me. As far as f/4 is concerned, this slightly smaller aperture from f/2.8 is offset by the 7D Mark II having superb image quality at ISO 10,000 and above. Plus I saved over $ as well.

RALPH B.

2017-12-10T04:29:45

I love this lens, beautiful pictures straight from f4, contrast and sharpness are just stoning. I don't need image stabilizer, but for those who need this tool for video work, may want to spend a little more. Very recommended

walter v.

2017-09-15T20:00:00

One of the users I've discovered that nobody has mentioned is as a macro lens. There I said it. I put a Kenke 12mm extension tube on it and just wow! No need to buy the 100 or 180 macro lens as this covers all ranges. I have a 50d crop camera and a 6d full frame camera so all my lenses are very versatile. Range is 70 ff to 320 crop frame with macro as a bonus and this lens is about as much a value as you will find anywhere. I won't repeat all the effusive praise others have written except to say I concur with most of it.

Jtjob

Originally posted at

2017-08-22T20:00:00

I purchased this lens second hand and must say its perfect! The majority of my shots have been sports shots. And i can't get over how clear and vivid the pics are. I am still learning to use in low light but during a game in the sun this lens is fantastic!!!

jjmmagoo

Originally posted at

2017-08-15T15:00:18

Great lens. If the 2.8 version busts your budget, then this is a very good substitute. Does not have IS but for the $ I do not see that being a necessity.

Ron T.