Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 DI VC USD Zoom Lens for Nikon DSLR, USA 6 Year Warranty - Bundle - With 77mm UV Glass filter, New Leaf 3 Year (Drops & Spills) Warranty, Lowepro S&F Lens Exchange Case 200 AW

Tamron
Tamron 70-200mm: Picture 1 thumbnail Tamron 70-200mm: Picture 2 thumbnail Tamron 70-200mm: Picture 3 thumbnail Tamron 70-200mm: Picture 4 thumbnail Tamron 70-200mm: Picture 5 thumbnail
Tamron 70-200mm: Picture 1 regular $1,529.00

Tamron 70-200mm Features

  • High-speed telephoto zoom with built-in image stabilization (VC Vibration Compensation)
  • The most compact lens in its class
  • Fast F/2.8 aperture throughout the zoom range
  • Delivers leading-edge image quality with 1 XLD (Extra Low Dispersion) glass and 4 LD elements
  • New VC anti-shake mechanism with 4-stop advantage
  • USD (Ultrasonic Silent Drive) powers a speedy AF drive together with continuous manual focus control (Full-Time Manual/FTM)
  • Full time manual focus (FTM) for fine-focus adjustments without the need to change focus modes on camera or lens
  • Moisture-resistant construction helps prevent water from penetrating the lens
  • A rounded diaphragm retains a nearly circular shape even at two stops down from its fully open F/2.8 aperture for beautiful bokeh

Tamron 70-200mm Specifications

Construction
17 Groups/ 23 Elements
Angle of view
34°21' ?12°21' (for full frame 35mm format cameras)
22°33' ?7°59' (for APS-C format cameras)
F stop range
2.8-32
Closest Focusing Distance
51.2"
Maximum Magnification
1:8 (at f=200mm: MFD 51.2")
Diaphragm Blades
9 (rounded diaphragm)
Filter Size
77mm
Overall Length
7.4"
Weight
51.9 oz.
Mfr #
AFA009N-700 Z
SKU
TM70200VNKZ

Tamron 70-200mm Reviews

Review Snapshot®

 
4.4

(based on 93 reviews)

93%

of respondents would recommend this to a friend.

Ratings Distribution

  • 5 Stars

     

    (54)

  • 4 Stars

     

    (30)

  • 3 Stars

     

    (6)

  • 2 Stars

     

    (2)

  • 1 Stars

     

    (1)

Reviewed by 93 customers

 
4.0

Great lens at a reasonable price

By

from Sequim WA  -  Photo Enthusiast

Read and watched lots of reviews and comparisons with the Canon 70-2002.8 IS II. Mostly said that the Tamron was about 95% as good. For me, the price was reasonable, and the savings over the Canon allowed me to buy a 70D (to replace my 60D)with the money saved. Is it perfect? Not exactly, but neither am I. Shot events with it wide open indoors at ISO 3200, and about 90+% keepers.

 
4.0

Tamron 70mm-200mm f/2.8 DI LD

By

from Columbia,TN  -  Photo Enthusiast

I have use this in Landscape, and plan on using this in events, sports,wedding, etc.. I like the easy way to go from manuel to auto focusing, the fast recovery. All in all it's a good lense and good price for me.

 
5.0

Excellent lens

By

from Dallas, TX  -  Photo Enthusiast

good for portraits, nice "bokeh". fast focus and delivers sharp pictures.

 
4.0

Amazing lens, amazing price

By

from New Orleans, LA  -  Pro Photographer

SUMMARY In addition to this lens, I have owned the Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 ED, the Nikon 80-200mm f2.8 AF-s, the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR, and have used the Sigma f2.8 EX. This lens is on-par for sharpness with the Nikkor glass, and far better than the Sigma, which is a mess in terms of aberration and distortion at the extremes. I prefer it to all of the other lenses, including the Nikon VR. I got mine for about $400 used-if you shoot weddings or events, this is a must-have piece of glass. PROS Optical quality - Comparable to the Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR Ease of use - the push/pull manual focus function is wonderful, with live view and this lenses ability to close focus, I rarely pull out my macro lens for anything but ring shots at a wedding, or if I find a weird insect or something. Price - Pretty obvious, here. Yes, you give up VR, but when shooting people, I am generally keeping my shutter speed above 1/160 anyhow. Anything else, I'm on a tripod. I'd love the VC version, but I can't justify the expense. 77mm filters Included tripod collar Included petal hood that works very well CONS Weight - Can't do much about this for a 3x f2.8 zoom with a lot of glass inside. Get a Black Rapid or similar strap and carry by the tripod collar! Autofocus performance - Tends to hunt in low light, slower than the Nikons, but better than the Sigma. Autofocus - Doesn't always nail focus, especially has trouble with eyes on a full-length subject. When it nails it, it's magic. I just have to be vigilant.

 
5.0

Love this Lens

By

from Caldwell, ID  -  Pro Photographer

I love this lens! I have also have the Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC Zoom Lens and I love it too. Great lens for a great price. I use both my lens on my Canon Mark 5d III without any problems at all. The VC works wonderfully and the low light abilities are great!

 
4.0

Great value w/ 6 year warranty

By

from Florida  -  Semi-pro Photographer

I have other Tamron lenses for Nikon so I thought I would try this one as an alternative to an OEM lens. You get your monies worth and a 6 year warranty. Although it doesn't come with a soft case, it fits mounted to my D7100 in both my Kata and Click backpacks (lens hood turned backwards). Attached is one of the first pictures I took w/ a polarized filter. I'm fairly fit, so the weight isn't a problem however, I could see where it would get heavy shooting for a few hours without a mono or tripod.

(2 of 2 customers found this review helpful)

 
5.0

Excellent.....!

By

from india  -  Semi-pro Photographer

I am using this lens for wedding and some events, Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 VC in low light is working very great

(1 of 1 customers found this review helpful)

 
5.0

Equal to Canon Image Quality

By

from Little Rock, AR  -  Pro Photographer

I photograph historic sites for my job and needed a lens that would allow me to shoot indoors where flash and tripods are not allowed. I've rented Canon's 70-200 f/2.8 IS and it's certainly a great lens, but a little outside my budget. I tried the Tamron version and I cannot see any difference in performance and image quality. The VC is astonishing! Hand-held the VC easily gains four stops and is perfect for indoor, low light situations. It's easily held, looks great, and captures incredible colors. Highly recommended!

 
5.0

Love this lens!

By

from GA  -  Photo Enthusiast

Photographing birds in my yard. Crystal clear images! Only con...is heavy

 
5.0

This lens ROCKS!!!

By

from Santa Clara, UT  -  Semi-pro Photographer

I am so pleasantly surprised that this lens is so great! I've only had a chance to do two photo shoots with it, but it easily competes with it's Canon counterpart for $1000 less. I'm thrilled!!!

Q&A

Questions & Answers Powered by TurnTo®

Questions about this item:

Shopper  What is the difference in this 70 - 200 and other long lens? I want a long lens for wild life photo's?
PAVEL V  Well this could be answered a few ways, but I will stick to 2 of them. First if comparing it to other lenses with exactly the same specifications (F2.8 70-200) the difference with this lenses and other is that it is cheaper ($1700 cheaper), and it is almost just as sharp. I say almost because I have personally used both lenses(nikon and tamron) and nikon is sharper at the 150-200mm range. Now part 2 could be answered like this: difference with this and other lenses ( like say a superzoom sigma 18-250mm f3.5-5.6,) is the sharpness, the f-stop, price, and size. If sharpness is not an issue, and you are on a budget, the sigma is a good bet. Yes it does have distortion at the higher end, and alot softer at the 200mm than typical 70-200mm lenses. Yet the sigma is alot smaller, and easier to carry. If budget is not an issue, than go for the tamron f2.8 70-200mm, or the nikon version. If you want an even better zoom, try the 300mm or the 400mm lenses which will really provide the zoom you want for wildlife. Im sure there are other answers for your questions, but I believe those those might be what your looking for.
Shopper  What is the difference in this 70 - 200 and other long lens? I want a long lens for wild life photo's?
PAVEL V  Well this could be answered a few ways, but I will stick to 2 of them. First if comparing it to other lenses with exactly the same specifications (F2.8 70-200) the difference with this lenses and other is that it is cheaper ($1700 cheaper), and it is almost just as sharp. I say almost because I have personally used both lenses(nikon and tamron) and nikon is sharper at the 150-200mm range. Now part 2 could be answered like this: difference with this and other lenses ( like say a superzoom sigma 18-250mm f3.5-5.6,) is the sharpness, the f-stop, price, and size. If sharpness is not an issue, and you are on a budget, the sigma is a good bet. Yes it does have distortion at the higher end, and alot softer at the 200mm than typical 70-200mm lenses. Yet the sigma is alot smaller, and easier to carry. If budget is not an issue, than go for the tamron f2.8 70-200mm, or the nikon version. If you want an even better zoom, try the 300mm or the 400mm lenses which will really provide the zoom you want for wildlife. Im sure there are other answers for your questions, but I believe those those might be what your looking for.
top
Share this item:
Adorama.com is top rated for customer serviceHACKER SAFE certified sites prevent over 99.9% of hacker crime.
Feedback