Adorama Camera
Adorama Learning Center
Techniques and How-Tos
PhotoZAP: We Critique Your Photos
PhotoZAP 40: Pink sky country

PhotoZAP 40: Pink sky country

Back to PhotoZAP: We Critique Your Photos page
Average: 2.0 stars
 

Our critics praise and pan your pictures

By

“I’m not quite sure I understand the logic of the simulated infrared here.”—Mason Resnick


 

Bookmark and Share

© John Sandstedt, Dayton , NJ. Gear: Canon 30D, Canon 17-85mm IS zoom lens; polarizing filter. Exposure: F/8 at 1/320 sec, daylight balanced. Post-processing: In Adobe Photoshop CS2, the horizon was straightened and the image cropped.  Channel Mixer was used to decolorize the image; sliders were then adjusted to create a simulated infrared effect.

Photographer’s statement:  “I was on a tour of the Southwest National Parks.  The itinerary included rafting from Page, AZ (Lake Powell and the Glen Canyon Dam) to the starting point for the brave souls that do white water rafting in Grand Canyon.  The canyon walls are +/- 2400 feet high in spots and I just kept shooting.”

 

Our critics say...

 

Mason Resnick: I’m not quite sure I understand the logic of the simulated infrared here, especially since it doesn’t really work that well. For instance, the greenery on the right side on the shore should be much lighter to more properly simulate an infrared effect. I think this scene is strong enough that gimmicks aren’t necessary. I would rather see it as a straight color or black-and-white image, perhaps with the sky darkened dramatically (like Ansel Adams), without the faux-IR/selective colorization, which doesn’t really make much sense here.

Monica Cipnic: I have to agree with Mason, I don't feel that the infrared effect benefits or enhances what was sure to be a 'naturally' spectacular scene. Compositionally speaking, I'm wondering what the image looked like before cropping. In this version, the viewer's eye is drawn to the clouds (the brightest area of the image), but in the original version, the water, reflections and sky, along with the foliage and the cliffs of variegated sandstone colors would create a more balanced and pleasing image.

Jack Howard: For the IR effect to work, more tweaking needs to be done, especially with the foliage, as Mason points out. That row of trees should be glowing! And there should be more cyan in the monochrome areas for that brickish and Cyan IR feel. But honestly, I'd rather see this image as a straight high-contrast monochrome than what it is now, or with any additional in-post IR stylizing.

 

What do you think? Leave a comment!

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

3 readers rated this article. Average rating: 2.0 stars
 
  • View
  • 3 comments
0 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
Ok

Not that I pretend to know more than anyone else, I'd thought I'd just comment on how I see the picture. The landscape as a whole appears disjointed between the shadow on the left, the great detail on the right and the pink on top and in the water...I agree the landscape itself is good enough to hold attention, but it feels too busy for such a setting, I think I missed the point of what the photographer was going for. Must have been a fun trip though.

by in NYC on

1 of 6 people found this comment helpful
 
Boo, on the ratings

It's apparent that the reviewers are not familiar with the techniques I employed. Perhaps, in my description, it was not apparent exactly what was done. That being said, the point was that in order to hold B&W details, the simulated infrared was mandatory. If one doesn't like the "pink" sky that's an individual decision. One could have a greenish or bluish sky usin g the same procedure. The point is - a unique result.

by in Dayton, NJ on

2 of 3 people found this comment helpful
 
IR or Pink + Gray?

I like the review of the critics. It is the picture itself that should draw attention, not the method. For an average viewer this is a pink-gray landscape shot. To my personal taste only, this mix is not so pleasing. I like the picture, but not in these tones. I would rather go with B&W, but I think Monica is right on target with the composition note. The eye falls on the white clouds, and then when trying to move along, is being constantly pulled back to them. It is because the clouds are the brightest part of the picture, as well as their position between two mountains (the eye, kind of, slides down on their edges and finally rests on the clouds). Chances are, that making it in color, would create other points of interest, so the eye could easily jump to them. Also, I would recommend a very interesting article on this website written by Mason: "What color is your seamless background" - http://www.adorama.com/ALC/Article.aspx?id=12235

by in Tampa, FL on

Items per page
Showing 3 of 3 results
Bookmark this page