Putting the Best Face Forward

Back to Portraits and People page
Average of 5 ratings: 3.0 stars
 

5 comments Read comments Rate this article

Posing for Portraits, Part V

By Joe Farace

December 21, 2011

When a person has a portrait made, they often ask the photographer to make sure they “get their good side.” But do people really have "good" and "bad" sides? You betcha!


The asymmetrical nature of faces means there is really is a “good” side and it’s the portrait photographer’s job to emphasize it. That along with retouching can produce a flattering—but not always realistic—image of the person being photographed. Yet few people complain if they look better in their portrait than they do in “real life.”

There really is a “bad” side!

Faces are not symmetrical and we really do have a “good” and “bad” side that photographs better or worse than the other side. Experienced models know this and will only give you what they think is their best side...but they’re often wrong. That’s why it’s a good idea, when working with a portrait subject, to shoot a few test shots and determine which side of their face looks best. Keep in mind that this pose may be lighting dependent, so what looks great under directional lighting may look completely different under soft or flat lighting. The important thing to remember is that even drop-dead-gorgeous subjects have a good side and a bad side. Learn early in the session which side works best.

 

Here is a set of images made during a session where I photographed a subject from different angles. It doesn’t hurt that she’s beautiful—not matter which way you photograph her—but you will see a difference between the left and right side of her face. The lighting is the same for both photographs and the same camera and lens were used. In the first image she is posed with her face in the same direction as her shoulders, which is usually not the best way to create a dynamic portrait but works here.

 

This is a cropped version of the original image that I made so that you could compare the next shot with the subject’s face at a similar head size. Shot with a Nikon D90 and AF-S Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 VR lens that produces the 35mm equivalent of 27-157.5mm focal length with the D90. Exposure was 1/50 second at f/13 and ISO 200. Cropped this way, the original image also works as a headshot!

 

This image was cropped in camera they way you see it and the subject still looks beautiful when turning her head in the opposite direction as her shoulders, but if you compare the two images, she looks slightly different (but still fabulous). I asked her to bring her hand up to her face and she did this with great delicacy. Tip: One way to get this look is to tell the subject to barely touch her face, not push against it, which can cause unattractive bulges and distortions. Here’s it’s perfectly done, a textbook example.



Joe Farace is the author of “Studio Lighting Anywhere”  which is available from Adorama

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

5 readers rated this article. Average rating: 3.0 stars
 
  • View
  • 5 comments
1 of 3 people found this comment helpful
 
Confused about confusion

I don't understand the confusion here. The article states that 1) faces are not symmetrical and therefore one side photgraphs better that the other; 2) photographers should take test shots early in the session to determine which side is better; 3) the lighting setup and how you have your subject pose may affect the resulting determination. Armed with this information we now know to use our judgement to make the call, and we also know that there are factors that we can control that may affect the decision. I'm good with that. Good article.

by Captn Ahab in Chicago on January 13, 2012

5 of 6 people found this comment helpful
 
Agree with confused

Expected pointers on how to determine which is the good side vs bad side. But the images posted are not easy to compare because the pose is different on each side. Also he tells us the lens he used and exposure information, but not the actual focal length he used to take these photos.

by Keith in Illinois on December 31, 2011

4 of 5 people found this comment helpful
 
+1 on Confused

There was no discussion about facial features which are critical in selecting the "good" side, nor was there any mention of lighting options to enhance or de-emphasize features. The article simply showed two images and said they "looked different" with no discussion about why that is or how it relates to the point of the article.

by Richard in North Carolina on December 31, 2011

5 of 6 people found this comment helpful
 
Left Hanging

I agree with the above comment that there is no conclusion. I kept looking for advice on how to determine the good side vs bad side of someone and was left hanging. I hope there willl be an answer on how to determine this.

by Ben in Alaska on December 30, 2011

22 of 23 people found this comment helpful
 
Confused

The premise of the article is to find the subject's good side. The conclusion tells us a better way pose a subject rather than identifying characteristics of "good side" vs. "bad side." After reading this I have a new way to pose a subject but am left in the dark about which way to pose my subject to get his or her best side. Is there a part 2 coming?

by Robert in California on December 21, 2011

Items per page
Showing 5 of 5 results

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
Bookmark this page