


See Options
Need help? Ask our experts.
Review Summary
2021-09-17T17:17:16
Excellent paper for my cyanotype prints!! I cannot recommend this highly enough. Gorgeous detail and color with this paper!
BECKY B.
2016-09-08T09:08:57
Paper handles well with repeated washings. Attractive and heavy. Printing from digital negatives leads to a sharp image with good contrast. Good sizing that prevents over-absorption of the sensitizer.
James S.
2016-06-16T19:07:07
This is a fine paper. Platinum, palladium -- for which it is great! I never learned to expose and process for platinum and palladium, only for silver gelatin. My softer negs print easily in platinum on this paper. Unfortunately, however, I mostly work with gold, rhodium and iridium. Gold looks like a serigraph on this paper. Even the lowest contrast Texas Chrysotype -- 3 drops of 1% C in 10 ml of 40% ammonium ferric oxalate -- was still too contrasty. And rhodium and iridium were nonreactive. But if you print platinum and/or palladium this paper may well be your new standard. I urge you to try it. Bergger cot 320 is hard to get consistently and Arches Platine was reformulated in 2015 -- and not for the better.
RICHARD P.