Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mirrorless Digital Camera - Silver - with 12-50mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ Zoom Lens

2013-09-04T21:00:00

I'm a landscape photographer from Vermont. I rarely shoot any kind of sporting event so I can't comment on that. I think this camera is simply amazing. For the money I don't think it gets any better. I also have a Canon T4i and the OM-D blows the T4i out of the water. It's very fast autofocus makes capturing hummingbirds a breeze and it's large variety of color modes and filters can lend themselves favorably to any scene. I have been shooting a lot at night and the OM-D is incredible in low light. My big complaint; the lenses I have do not offer the ability to manually focus easily, ie; there's no focusing ring that you can set to infinity. But that's a complaint about lenses, not the camera body. I really love the kit lens's built in macro feature, I use it way more than I ever thought I would. My other complaint is that sometimes the white balance can be a little off, not a deal breaker, it's just a quick fix in editing. I really have no real complaints, it's small, comfortable and takes stunning photographs. And while it may have a smaller sensor than a DSLR, I honestly think it has a higher resolution than most. I love it, and if I lost it today I would order another without giving it a second thought!

Aron M.

2013-08-04T21:00:00

I use this camera mostly for street/casual photography. Pros: The small size is great for those days I don't want to lug a DSLR around. The OM-D and 5 lenses (17mm, 19mm, 30mm, 45mm, 45-150mm) all fit easily in a small shoulder bag. The image quality is stunning, the "oly colors" are beautiful. It focuses lightening fast and accurately, even in low light. It also has one of the best EVF's I've even seen. It's also just a beautiful little camera to look at. Cons: I hate, hate, hate the location of the on/off switch. It really belongs on top of the camera. I really would not have much issue with the location of the switch if I didn't have to turn the camera on and off so often, becuase this thing eats batteries like there is no tomorrow. Don't even think about shooting all day without at least one or two spare batteries. Some people don't like the cramped ergonomics and so have to spend an extra the way overpriced optional handgrip accessory. I actually like the feel of the camera without the handgrip better (once I remove the annoying neckstrap holder).

MICHAEL W.

2013-07-22T21:00:00

I have been shooting an Olympus E-500 but the E-M5 is now my camera of choice. I like the many features, some found only on more expensive models. Not much to dislike other than the first one I ordered had an issue with the Electronic View Finder. Adorma quickly replaced it, with no problems. There are a lot of setting, which can be a good thing as well as making a fair learning curve, although that's probably true of any of the new digital cameras. Using and being familiar with other Olympus cameras is a help

WENDELL H.

2013-07-09T21:00:00

I haven't been able to take many photos yet but am looking forward to doing so. The first one I ordered had a defect in the EVF so I had to return it to Adorama. Just received the replacement today. No hassles, great service.

WENDELL H.

2013-07-08T21:00:00

I love this camera! I had grown tired of my DSLR (Canon 40D) because it felt too big and bulky -- I wasn't getting out and taking pictures because it was a pain to lug around. But I didn't want the limitations of a point and shoot. The OM-D E-M5 is a perfect solution. Image quality is at least as good as and probably better than my DSLR. The size and weight are perfect -- small and easy to carry but not so small that its awkward to hold or adjust settings. The range of lenses available is wonderful, definitely a plus compared to other mirror less camera lines, and the lenses are so compact compared to DSLR lenses. I thought it might feel like a compromise to go mirror less but there is absolutely nothing I miss after after making the switch.

JOHN G.

2013-07-01T21:00:00

A five star so far. I've been using Olympus micro 4/3 equipment for a couple of years and have been very happy with it. I needed something with a built in viewfinder so I could use it with my studio equipment. Have been very happy with this one. Image quality, built, ergonomics all excellent. You won't go wrong here!

PhotoDan

2013-05-13T21:00:00

Very pleased with everything about the camera

WILLIAM V.

2013-03-25T21:00:00

After a couple weeks with this camera I have noticed horrible banding at ISO 1600 and above. Extensive LR corrections can be made to alleviate this but at night in certain situations(i.e. sky, shadows, dark areas). I would recommend this camera for still photography and the likes, but not for anything with alot of movement.

SEAN H.

2013-03-14T21:00:00

I have some health issues that made using my old DSRL problematic, making me not want to shoot much any more due to the weight. I have been keeping an eye on the Micro 4/3's for a while and last year I bought the then new OMD. I got the 12-50 kit lens and the panny 25 1.4, and the 40-150 (due to weight or I would have bought the 100-300) I sold my old system to fund this and have NEVER regretted it! I shoot outside in good light, indoors with poor light. I've shot bands in very dark bars using ISO6400 and can print 11x14 without issue! The stabilization is awesome! The high ISO is great, very clean, and if it's a little noisy at 12600 make it black and white and you're set! Many don't like the 12-50 kit lens, but I find it to be sharp and a great walk around length. I've used in in rain and snow storms and the weatherproofing seems great. My only complaint is the battery life. Get backups! I highly recommend this system!

KRISTIN H.

2013-01-19T19:00:00

I shoot some weddings, sporting events for a local newspaper, do studio portraits and some macro work. I used to use a C**** system that gave me fits with auto-focus problems, and coupled with wanting to reduce overall equipment weight, led me to this fantastic OM-D. I initially bought the kit (for a great price) but have sold the 12-50mm lens and replaced it with the Panasonic 12-35 f2.8 and the Panasonic 35-100 f2.8, both of which are Leica-designed, MUCH sharper, contrtasty, and nano-coated. Along with some OLY primes and the Pana-Leica 25mm f1.4 I have a system that produces images every bit as good, and in many cases better than, my old C**** system. The number of wasted or spoiled shots is far less. The touch-screen auto-focus/ shutter is phenomenal, especially for candids. The weather sealing is excellent. The system's lenses are among the best available, and for macro/ portrait work simply can't be beat. I've taken enlargements up to 20x30 consistently with no falloff (every bit as good or better than my old C****system). Ergonomics took a little getting used to, and I highly recommend the HLD-6 battery grip for heft and for extended battery life due to the second battery in the grip. Battery life is short, only about 300-350 shots. With the battery grip I've gotten upwards of 800. I used to consistently exceed 1000 with the C**** camera, but too many were wasted due either to autofocus issues or auto-exposure issues. The art filters are very cool, and a nice touch because they are high quality, not cheesy. The camera is configurable to your specific needs in any way imaginable. This is a sophisticated camera body definitely worthy of the best glass you can afford to put on it. The reward is phenomenal jpegs, right out of the camera! I shoot Large-superfine (the highest res choice) and the pics often look 3-D! The overall system weight has dropped for me, by about two-thirds, with no decrease in flexibility. As a matter of fact, my flexibility, creativity and overall results have increased and improved significantly. I couldn't be happier about making the switch, but the glass does matter, and if you get the best available then you'll be thrilled with the results.

OLY-lover