The best lenses for Photojournalists

Back to Lenses and Filters page
Average of 11 ratings: 3.2 stars
 

11 comments Read comments Rate this article

Buying tips: When it comes to glass, get the finest you can afford

By Mason Resnick

November 10, 2011

Just is there’s no best camera for photojournalists, there is also no best lens. But there is a range of lens types that will give you a better chance at getting the shot.


The key here is versatility and speed—as in large apertures. Photojournalists should use lenses with an aperture of f/2.8 or faster, but this can be pricey. Durability, and at best, weather sealing, are important as well because you may find yourself shooting in rain, snow or even in sandstorms. Most of the fast lenses are also well protected against the elements, but read the specs to be sure.

In an ideal world, you need two basic lenses: a 28-70mm f/2.8 and a 70-200mm f/2.8 (assuming you’re shooting with a full-frame DSLR). This duo gives you a wide range of focal lengths that will cover many situations. But whether you’re using Canon, Nikon or an indie brand, these lenses will be expensive, and heavy. Is it possible to cut down on your costs when starting out?

Also read: My Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L Turns 10

One way to pare down your expenses is to start with prime lenses. A 28mm f/2.8, 35mm f/1.8 and 50mm f/1.8 or f/1.4 prime in your bag will likely weigh about as much as a single 28-70mm f/2.8 lens, but will set you back considerably less—especially if you buy used. In fact, used lenses are another budget-friendly way to add to your gear.

Why prime lenses rather than enthusiast-level zooms? First, if you get a prime, you’ll get nice, wide maximum apertures, making the lenses more useful in low light. Second, a lower-priced zoom not only has smaller maximum apertures, but the overall image quality might not be as stellar as what you can get with pro glass. This will be especially apparent at the maximum focal length. 

The one thing you shouldn’t compromise on is quality. The classic advice to buy the best lens you can afford—even if that means getting a lesser camera—is especially true for photojournalists. Sharp, well-exposed images with excellent color and contrast are what editors demand. In newspapers, quality will get lost in the transition from an original file to the newsprint version, so you want to be able to deliver the best quality original that you can.

Borrow or rent a pro lens and shoot with it for a few days, and you’ll quickly see the difference in quality.

Also read: The best DSLRs for Photojournalists

While there are many, many more possibilities (The Leica rangefinder camera/lens system for instance, is a lightweight, unobtrusive, but pricey alternative to consider) , here are 18 lenses made with photojournalists in mind:


Canon


Nikon


Independent lens companies

Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM  Canon   Nikon
Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX Aspherical IF EX DG HSM Canon  Nikon
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EG DG OS HSM Canon Nikon
Tokina 16-50mm f/2.8 Pro DX AF Zoom Canon
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR DI LD-IF  Canon  Nikon
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 DI LD (IF) Macro  Canon  Nikon

 

What lenses do you find indespensable? Scroll down and leave a comment!

 

This article was updated on November 10, 2011.

About The Author

Mason Resnick is the editor of the Adorama Learning Center and a lifetime photography enthusiast.

moreRelated Workshops

Related Products

Browse products:

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Forward this article to a friend
To use this functionality you should have JS enabled
Bookmark this page

Reader Rating and Comments

11 readers rated this article. Average rating: 3.2 stars
 
  • View
  • 11 comments
0 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
What?

Why would a Photojournalist need to get lens advice from an Adorama article? Don't be ridiculous. Almost every working PJ uses a fast pro zoom. We don't have time to be swapping out primes when news is happening.

by PJ in Somewhere between here and there... on January 7, 2012

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Olympus

You are missing the best one... Oly 35-100mm (70-200 FF), F2.0

by Chumby in Australia on March 2, 2011

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
nikkor 18-70

This lens is sharp as heck and not too slow. Light to carry, and built pretty well, too. I can't find much wrong with it.

by Johnelle in slc on February 14, 2011

1 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
17-55

what about the 17-55? the, in essence, the 24-70 of DX for nikon. i'm curious to hear a response for this lens for photojournalism etc.

by albeeeeeezy in LA on November 3, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
You Left Out the Most Important Nikon Prime!!!!

Nikon 85 mm 1.8D

by medusa in wv on May 14, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Third Party Collection

I have a collection of third party lenses that fit neatly in a pack. They are: Tokina 11-16 f2.8, Sigma 18-50 f2.8, Sigma 70 f2.8 macro and Sigma 120-400 f4.5-5.6. This is on a small frame Canon. The only lens' that I have qualms with is the 18-50, which has strong ca's in high contrast scenes and the 120-400 which could be sharper (for $750?). For the money it has been an excellent collection. I also wouldn't mind seeing Lieca, Olypus, Pentax etc. being included more often in these articles.

by dmunk in Winnemucca, NV on May 6, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
LENS SPECTRUM

I prefer the Canon EF24-105L, EF100L, and EF100-400L for a full spectrum of lens coverage with excellent results.

by nolo_pi in Los Angeles on April 28, 2010

0 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
Canon EF 28-300 f3.5-5.6L

pro - never change lenses again con - it's over $2400, and weighs 3.7 lbs

by david-o in la jolla, california on April 14, 2010

0 of 0 people found this comment helpful
 
Pentax 50mm f1.4 and DA*200mm f2.8

These are all I need.

by Ahab in Oracle, Az. on April 14, 2010

0 of 1 people found this comment helpful
 
no 12-24mm love?

You're missing the 12-24mm piece of the puzzle. Especially if you're a 1.3 shooter. Sure, it's slow, it's a sigma, it's corners are soft etc etc etc, but it's a wicked lens and the only true wide option for canon's crop. Then on FF it's an entirely different world!

by benjacobsen.com in Rhode Island on March 25, 2010

Items per page
Showing 10 of 11 results
Page:

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields

Was this article helpful?

Rate this article

Your rating:

Post a comment

*required fields
Bookmark this page