Used Zeiss 35mm F/2 T* ZM Biogon Lens, for & Leica M Mount Rangefinder Cameras, Silver

2023-06-24T03:04:06

I bought the silver version of this lens about 12 years ago for my Zeiss Ikon. I've since used it on various Sony's, an M3 and currently it's my go to on my Leica M10 monochrom. Image quality is outstanding, light weight, a bit larger than a 35 sumicron but not a large lens by any means. It's a value on it's own and comparing price to a sumicron it really shines. It makes up the majority of my Instagram feed. There really isn't anything not to like about this lens in my opinion.

Keith P.

2021-12-28T07:41:51

Solid lens, sharpness and render outstanding.

luis p.

2018-07-10T16:03:40

I wanted to return to using a 35mm moderate w/a lens on my M2 & M4-P. Before buying this lens, I rented one from a well known rental outfit. I took the (rented) lens to Coney Island and & Brighton Beach. I shot some HP-5 on an overcast day. As soon as I got home & processed the film, I packed up the lens, sent it out and contacted Adorama and bought the silver body lens. I find it's easier to see the markings on silver rather than the black lens, but that just might be me with my 66 year-old eyes. The lens achieves a nice balance on the M bodies. It weighs around 8 oz., but it's not 'nose heavy' vs. the Summicron. It is longer then the 'cron, but in my opinion, not an issue. I'm a fan of the 1/3 f/stop settings. The build quality is second to none. I'm not going to get into the 'Leica vs. Everyone Else' argument about the construction. You can read that nonsense elsewhere on the 'net. The focus is smooth, with a short throw from infinity to minimum distance. I like the little focus bump, it works for me (but I have damage to my fingers) but other may like the scalloped device found on the 'cron. The lens takes a 43mm filter. I know that gets some people & reviewers all in a fit, but it really is no big deal. The lens is sharp wide-open, and gives great performance as you stop it down. I'm not a pixel counter, no do I really care about the bokah. I shoot B&W film without a flash in all sorts of lighting conditions. I like the slightly more contrasty images it produces. My only quibble is the poorly designed lens cap. Come on Zeiss, you can redesign it. This lens is a great buy for the price. I'm taking it to Ireland in a few weeks as my only lens. I have that much confidence in the lens.

DANIEL C.

2017-05-23T12:53:43

It's works perfectly with the LeciaM240. I'm Recording the Light one subject at a time. Fabulously! !

LaWanda B.

2013-04-09T21:00:00

From the rolls I've developed so far, the negs look on par with the Leica 35mm f/2 asph that I owned. Not bad for 1/3 of the price. The build quality is probably just below the Leica, but certainly above some of the CV lenses that I have owned.

Jim

2010-05-08T21:00:00

My last camera had a 35mm lens that was a poor performer, so this lens is a real treat. Check the MTF charts on the Zeiss site for the fuller story, but basically the lens is superb. I use it mostly at f2.8 and f4 where the lens really shines, with excellent out of focus rendition. It's nice to be able to go to f2 in a pinch, but that's rare for me. The lens has essentially no distortion, making architectural photography (or any photography with straight lines near the edges of the frame) easier. The only gripe I have is the abysmal lens cap which is an embarrassing afterthought of a design for such a nice lens. It's so frustratingly bad I don't use it at all; instead I use the combination of the lens hood and a filter, which actually works surprisingly well. It's a great lens, which I highly recommend.

JEFFREY W.

2010-04-12T21:00:00

I recently bought a used Leica M8 and wanted a 35mm lens for my standard lens as they are roughly normal on a 1.3 factor camera. I evaluated this lens and the Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2 Nokton and chose this lens because 1.) it was sharper from f/2 to f/4, 2.) it weighs half as much, and 3.) it's build quality was superior (specifically, the aperture ring and focus tab). If you are considering both lenses, I think that ultimately the weight and whether you really need apertures below f/2 (the Nokton is soft here) are the main factors to think about; they are both fantastic lenses. Bottom line -- this is my favorite lens and I highly recommend it. Sharpness This lens is very sharp even at f/2 with improvement until around f/4. By f/2.8 it is extremely good, and even at f/2 you will be hard pressed to find fault with the sharpness unless you are doing a controlled test. A friend of mine described my photos with this lens as "scary sharp". This lens will let you see extremely fine details throughout the entire frame at f/8. I've read some reports that this lens is softer than the Nokton at f/2, but not my copies. Color and Contrast Zeiss lenses are famous for their contrasty look that makes colors pop, and this lens is no exception. Subjects tend to take on a 3D look due to how this lens transitions between in and out of focus. This lens has noticeably more contrast than the Nokton (of course you can tweak this when post-processing if you want more or less). Construction, Size and Weight This is a small, lightweight lens, though not quite as small as the Leica 35mm Type 4 Pre-ASPH. It's 1/2 the weight of the Nokton which is really huge and protrudes into the viewfinder. It is made out of metal with no plastic to be found, except for the lens cap (see Cons below). The aperture ring has a very nice resistance to it where each click represents 1/3 of a stop. You can easily select the aperture you want without looking if you count clicks. It focuses quickly and accurately; I swear I take more in focus pictures now than with my Canon 20D and autofocus lenses. The Nokton was slightly off at infinity (a common problem, apparently), but not this lens. The focus ring is nice and smooth with a focus tab (a bump on the focus ring) which lets you feel roughly where you are focusing (e.g. 6 o'clock is roughly 6 feet away). This greatly aids pre-focusing (guessing the focus before you look through the viewfinder). I don't ever want to shoot a rangefinder lens that lacks a focus tab from now on. Bokeh The bokeh is excellent. Out of focus lights are nearly perfectly circular. It's hard to get a lot of background blur due to the 35mm length and the short focusing distance, but given enough distance between your subject and the background you will get some very pleasing blur. Chromatic Aberration I haven't noticed any significant chromatic aberration with this lens. When shooting subjects outside on bright days, no purple fringes have reared their ugly heads yet. Distortion None -- this lens has 4x less distortion than the current Leica 35mm Summicron! Flare I'm not a real stickler for flare, but this lens has the best flare resistance I've ever seen. I've shot directly into the sun with a UV/IR filter and still didn't get any flare. I've only taken one picture with any flare so far which was a night shot directed at a bright light (also with filter). If you care about minimizing flare, this is the lens for you. Cons * The focus ring is slightly harder to turn when the camera is held vertically. In practice I haven't found this to be a problem and have taken plenty of great portrait orientation photos. * The lens cap is pretty bad. It's made of plastic and is hard to secure properly. It does fit when the lens hood is in place, which is a plus. * The lens hood is expensive. As a Canon shooter, I'm used to paying extra for lens hoods. I'm also used to them being plastic, which is not the case here. The lens hood is metal and vented. It works well and it looks very nice. It feels like less of a rip off than the Canon lens hoods due to its high quality construction.

Leica S.